Palin Endorses O'Donnell in Delaware
Permalink
Former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin has
endorsed
tea partier Christine O'Donnell (R) for the Republican senatorial nomination in Delaware. The primary will be held next Tuesday.
Up until now, the favorite has been Rep. Michael Castle (R-DE), a moderate who sometimes votes with the Democrats.
Castle has been in elected office in Delaware continuously for 30 years, first as lieutenant governor, then
governor for 8 years, then as a congressman since 1993. He is a real fixture in Delaware, known by everyone, and
very popular in the state. The entire Republican establishment throughout the country supports him, despite his
inconsistent voting record in the House.
So what's the big deal with Palin's endorsement? The establishment is scared to death of a repeat of the
situation in Alaska in which an unknown, but Palin-endorsed candidate, Joe Miller (R), beat an incumbent U.S. senator,
Lisa Murkowski, in the primary. While it was slightly embarrassing for the establishment candidate to lose in
Alaska, it is not a disaster since any Republican is the heavy favorite there and Miller can probably beat
Sitka mayor Scott McAdams (D) in the general election, although it may cost the NRSC a bit of money they would rather spend elsewhere.
Delaware is a completely different kettle of fish. If O'Donnell, an unmarried and apparently unemployed
far-right gadfly with very
extreme views
on sex and other topics, were to pull off a "Miller" and defeat Castle, she would be slaughtered by Chris Coons (D),
the executive of New Castle County, in the general election
and all hopes of the Republicans retaking the Senate in 2010 would go up in smoke.
Thus the national Republican party really, really, really, does not want O'Donnell to win. They are not willing
to sacrifice a shot at capturing the Senate in return for a couple of votes down the road where Castle might vote
with the Democrats and O'Donnell would vote with the Republicans.
This puts Palin and the Republican party on a direct collision course. Of course, much of
Palin's popularity is precisely that she is willing to take on the powers that be, even in her own party, so
for the next week her endorsement won't hurt her. If O'Donnell either wins or comes very close, Palin will get
much of the credit as O'Donnell, who ran for the Senate as a Republican in 2008 against Joe Biden and got only 35%
of the vote, is hardly a credible candidate on her own. On the other hand, if Castle wins big next week, it will
show that Palin's help has limits.
As an aside, in New Hampshire, which has an analogous primary Tuesday, in which appointed Attorney General
Kelly Ayotte (R) is running against tea partier Ovide Lamontagne (R), Palin endorsed Ayotte, even though ideologically
she is much closer to Lamontagne. How come? Simple. Ayotte has a good shot at being a U.S. sentor in January of 2012
and O'Donnell has close to zero chance of being a senator. Come the New Hampshire primary in January 2012, having one of the state's
senators on your side is a good thing for a primary candidate. Palin has been very careful about her endorsements.
In states that won't play a role in the 2012 nominating process, she always goes for the right winger. In states
that will play an important role (like New Hampshire, Iowa, and South Carolina),
she goes with the likely winner, ideology be damned. This is no accident. She knows exactly what she is doing.
Today's Polls: AZ IL MO WV
Permalink
Arizona |
Rodney Glassman |
37% |
John McCain* |
51% |
|
|
Sep 07 |
Sep 07 |
Rasmussen |
Illinois |
Alexi Giannoulias |
37% |
Mark Kirk |
41% |
|
|
Sep 07 |
Sep 07 |
Rasmussen |
Missouri |
Robin Carnahan |
43% |
Roy Blunt |
53% |
|
|
Sep 07 |
Sep 07 |
Rasmussen |
West Virginia |
Joe Manchin |
50% |
John Raese |
45% |
|
|
Sep 08 |
Sep 00 |
Rasmussen |
If you like this Website, tell your friends. You can also share by clicking this button
-- The Votemaster
|
Your donation is greatly appreciated. It will buy ads to publicize the site.
|