Government Bails out A.I.G.
After several days of saying it would not bail out the nation's largest
insurance company, A.I.G., the government
bailed out
A.I.G. risking $85 billion of the taxpayers' money.
In return, the government got 80% of the now near-worthless
stock. In other countries, when the government effectively buys (nearly) all of a company's
stock, it is called nationalization. Who would have thought that the Bush-Cheney
administration would go Marxist-Leninist in its waning hours? Treasury secretary Henry Paulson
was clearly afraid A.I.G.'s demise would take out too many other big players and
wreak massive damage
on the economy. The move will be very controversial since it risks public money to
protect bad investments made by A.I.G. management. The political fallout will be immense.
This nationalization poses an especially
large challenge
for John McCain, who is now railing against
corporate greed and lack of government regulation of the financial industry. What he doesn't
talk much about is how deregulation happened. It was the 1999
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
that repealed the 1933
Glass-Steagall Act
and thus eliminated the depression-era walls between between banking, investment, and insurance that
made this crisis possible.
Glass-Stegall erected walls between banking, investment management, and insurance, so problems in
one sector could not spill over into the others, which is precisely what is happening now.
The primary author of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was none other than
McCain's economic advisor, former senator Phil Gramm (who thinks the country is in a "mental recession").
McCain fully supported the bill and has
a decades-long track record of opposing government regulation of the financial industry.
His new-found conversion to being a fan of regulation is going to be a tough sell as Obama is
already
pointing out
that McCain got what he wanted (deregulation) and this is the consequence.
The Politics of Lying
Politicians have never been known for telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,
but generally when caught exaggerating the truth they usually stop. This year things seem to be different.
For example, Sarah Palin has said over and over that she never requested any earmarks as governor.
That is
patently false.
She requested $450 million in earmarks and got most of it. Although Congress
wouldn't finance the bridge to nowhere, Palin got to keep the money anyway and spend it on other projects.
When called on this,
a McCain spokesman, Brian Rogers said "We're running a campaign to win." In other words, we don't care what
the media think. Michael Cohen has a
column
in the NY Times about lying anno 2008.
Ruth Marcus has one on what an economist called
"the symmetry of sin."
The idea is that if a reporter criticizes McCain or Palin for lying, they have an obligation to criticize
Obama or Biden for lying, too. But she argues that it is not symmetric this year. Obama has been stretching
the truth a little bit like quoting McCain on staying in Iraq for 100 years (which he did say) but leaving
out the part where he compared it to the U.S. military presence in Germany for 60 years. In contrast,
McCain and Palin have told out-and-out lies (e.g., about how Obama would raise everyone's taxes, something he
never said)
and repeated them even after they were pointed out numerous times.
Absentee Voting
If you are unable to vote in person on election day (Nov. 4), you can vote
by absentee ballot. A new site govoteabsentee.org
will help you navigate the maze. In most states in the West, anybody who wants to can request an
absentee ballot without giving a reason. In the East you need a reason in some states, but "I won't
be at home on election day" is a valid reason. Absentee ballots can also be used for students who choose
to vote at their parents address, elderly people, or people who need a car to get to their precinct
and don't have one. If you think you might not be able to vote in person, check out this site. It also
helps you register. This may be the most important election in years, so be sure you vote.
Palin Beats Biden
In a
hypothetical matchup
for President, Sarah Palin defeats Joe Biden 47% to 44%. Palin has considerably less experience than Obama and
Biden has much more experience than McCain so the gulf between neophyte and graybeard couldn't be greater than
here. Palin has 6 years experience as mayor of a small village and 1 1/2 years as governor of a state with a quarter
the population of Brooklyn. Biden has 35 years in the U.S. Senate.
Yet the voters don't care. The implications for the real race are clear: campaigning on your experience
is probably not a winning strategy.
Today's Polls
We have four presidential polls today.
New Jersey |
48% |
45% |
Sep 10 |
Sep 14 |
Quinnipiac U. |
New Jersey |
49% |
41% |
Sep 11 |
Sep 14 |
Monmouth U. |
New York |
55% |
42% |
Sep 15 |
Sep 15 |
Rasmussen |
Vermont |
55% |
36% |
Sep 11 |
Sep 14 |
Research 2000 |
We also have one Senate poll.
New Jersey |
Frank Lautenberg* |
49% |
Richard Zimmer |
41% |
Sep 09 |
Sep 11 |
Research 2000 |
We also have three House polls in Utah.
UT-01 |
Morgan Boweb |
21% |
Rob Bishop* |
62% |
Sep 08 |
Sep 11 |
Dan Jones |
UT-02 |
Jim Matheson* |
62% |
Bill Dew |
27% |
Sep 08 |
Sep 11 |
Dan Jones |
UT-03 |
Bennion Spencer |
18% |
Jason Chaffetz* |
60% |
Sep 08 |
Sep 11 |
Dan Jones |
If you like this Website, tell your friends. You can also share by clicking this button
-- The Votemaster
|
Your donation is greatly appreciated. It will buy ads to publicize the site.
|