House Passes Bailout Bill, Bush Signs It
The House
passed
the Senate version of the bill to bail out Wall St. yesterday and
President Bush signed it into law. The secretary of the treasury can now begin buying
up troubled assets from whomever he wants and at whatever price he deems appropriate. The Dow Jones
index reacted to the news by dropping 157 points. Apparently investors aren't entirely
convinced the financial crisis is over.
The initial proposal was 3 pages; the final one was 451 pages. The difference is 448
pages of pork and tax cuts, something the leadership threw in knowing that recalcitrant
Republicans would be hesitant to vote against tax cuts a month before an election.
In theory, the taxpayers get something in return for their money--warrants to buy stock
in participating companies, but how many warrants the treasury gets per gigabuck invested
is not specified.
The bill also contains some minor measures to curb the worst excesses of executive pay.
For example, companies lose tax deductions on CEO salaries more than $500,000 a year
and CEOs who mismange their companies and then get golden parachutes more than three times
their annual salary have to pay a 20% excise tax on them. All in all, these measures do not
stop extravagant salaries, bonuses, and severance packages; they just make them more
expensive to the company and CEO. It is very likely that executives faced with the 20%
excise tax will simply demand (and get) a 25% larger package.
One interesting aspect of this whole project is how endangered members of the House
voted on the two bills. Below is a list of incumbents running for reelection taken from
our Hot House races page
and how they voted on the first bill (which was rejected) and the second one (which passed).
AZ-05 |
Dem |
Harry Mitchell |
No |
Yes |
AZ-08 |
Dem |
Gabrielle Giffords |
No |
Yes |
CA-11 |
Dem |
Jerry McNerney |
Yes |
Yes |
CT-02 |
Dem |
Joe Courtney |
No |
No |
FL-16 |
Dem |
Tim Mahoney |
Yes |
Yes |
GA-08 |
Dem |
Jim Marshall |
Yes |
Yes |
GA-12 |
Dem |
John Barrow |
No |
No |
IL-08 |
Dem |
Melissa Bean |
Yes |
Yes |
IN-02 |
Dem |
Joe Donnelly |
Yes |
Yes |
IN-08 |
Dem |
Brad Ellsworth |
Yes |
Yes |
IN-09 |
Dem |
Baron Hill |
No |
No |
KS-02 |
Dem |
Nancy Boyda |
No |
No |
LA-06 |
Dem |
Don Cazayoux |
No |
No |
MN-01 |
Dem |
Tim Walz |
No |
No |
MS-01 |
Dem |
Travis Childers |
No |
No |
NH-01 |
Dem |
Carol Shea-Porter |
No |
No |
NY-19 |
Dem |
John Hall |
Yes |
Yes |
NY-20 |
Dem |
Kirsten Gillibrand |
No |
No |
NY-24 |
Dem |
Mike Arcuri |
Yes |
Yes |
OH-18 |
Dem |
Zack Space |
Yes |
Yes |
PA-04 |
Dem |
Jason Altmire |
No |
No |
PA-10 |
Dem |
Chris Carney |
No |
No |
TX-22 |
Dem |
Nick Lampson |
No |
No |
TX-23 |
Dem |
Ciro Rodriguez |
No |
No |
WI-08 |
Dem |
Steve Kagen |
No |
No |
|
|
AK-AL |
GOP |
Don Young |
No |
No |
CO-04 |
GOP |
Marilyn Musgrave |
No |
No |
CT-04 |
GOP |
Chris Shays |
Yes |
Yes |
FL-13 |
GOP |
Vern Buchanan |
No |
Yes |
FL-21 |
GOP |
Lincoln Diaz-Balart |
No |
No |
FL-24 |
GOP |
Tom Feeney |
No |
No |
IL-10 |
GOP |
Mark Kirk |
Yes |
Yes |
MI-07 |
GOP |
Tim Walberg |
No |
No |
MI-09 |
GOP |
Joe Knollenberg |
No |
Yes |
MO-06 |
GOP |
Sam Graves |
No |
No |
NV-03 |
GOP |
Jon Porter |
Yes |
Yes |
NY-29 |
GOP |
Randy Kuhl |
No |
Yes |
NC-08 |
GOP |
Robin Hayes |
No |
No |
OH-01 |
GOP |
Steve Chabot |
No |
No |
OH-02 |
GOP |
Jean Schmidt |
No |
Yes |
PA-06 |
GOP |
Jim Gerlach |
No |
Yes |
WA-08 |
GOP |
Dave Reichert |
No |
No |
|
On the first bill, 9 endangered Democrats voted for it and 16 voted against it.
On the second bill it was 11 for and 14 against. Among the endangered Republicans,
only three were for it the first time and 14 were against it. The second time, with
the tax cuts and the pork thrown in, the split was 8 for and 9 against. The pork and
tax cuts clearly had a bigger effect on Republicans than on Democrats.
CQ Politics has a similar
analysis
based on its list of endangered incumbents. CQ Politics also notes that opponents of the these incumbents
immediately began exploring how to use these vote to hammer the incumbents. Anyone who voted No/No can be
accused of wanting a depression. Anyone voting No/Yes can be called a flip-flopper. Anyone voting Yes/Yes
can be called a lackey of Wall St. You're damned if you do and damned if you don't.
The NY Times has a
story
about how several representatives dealt with the pressure being applied to them.
McCain Will Take the Gloves Off
The McCain campaign (read: Steve Schmidt) has decided that being a war hero is not good enough,
being a POW is not good enough, being a maverick is not good enough,
and being a reformer is not good enough, so the mud is about to start
flying. The campaign has pulled all its positive ads touting McCain's experience and long service to the
country. From now on, the entire focus will be on Barack Obama's associations with
convicted Chicago developer Tony Rezko, 1960s radical William Ayers, and Obama's former pastor,
Rev. Jeremiah Wright. It is a high-risk gamble, but McCain loves to roll the dice. But this
fierce new strategy
has two potential downsides.
First, while partisan Republicans will love it (as they loved Sarah Palin's convention
speech), negative ads don't always work so well with independents, whose votes are now crucial to both sides.
Second, there is a very real danger that either Obama, or more likely, Democratic 527s will start throwing mud
right back at McCain. A few choice subjects for negative ads are (1) his taking bribes from convicted felon
Charles Keating in the 1980s, (2) the fact that he is an old man who has had a very dangerous form of cancer
four times, and (3) the way he divorced his crippled first wife to marry a beer heiress worth $100 million.
Clearly Schmidt knows all this but apparently he feels he has to shake things up before it is too late.
It is going to get real messy.
The 527s on both sides are already in the act, of course.
Here is an example of an
anti-Obama ad
and an example of an
anti-McCain ad.
Alaska Supreme Court to Hear Troopergate Appeal
If the Democrats want to get nasty, another line of attack is Troopergate, the story around
Sarah Palin's firing Alaska's commissioner of public safety for refusing to dismiss her estranged brother-in-law.
This story is
back in the news
again because the Alaska supreme court has agreed to hear an emergency appeal from laywers trying to shut down
the investigation, even though it was ordered by the Republican-controlled state legislature.
The two sides will present oral arguments next Wednesday and the court will rule on Thursday.
A report from the retired prosecutor hired by the legislature to investigate the matter, Steve Branchflower, is
due Friday. If Branchflower determines that Palin
abused her authority as governor to settle a family score, she will be in for withering criticism and McCain
will have to answer questions about how good he is at vetting personnel. It would be much better for him if the
whole investigation would just go away.
Palin Releases Tax Returns
Sarah Palin has
released
her tax returns. Like Joe Biden but unlike John McCain and Barack Obama, she is not a millionaire.
The adjused gross incomes for the four candidates are given below. However, it should be noted that John and
Cindy McCain file separate tax returns and the vast majority of the McCain's income and wealth is in Cindy's
name.
She
released
a summary of her 2006 income earlier this year that showed her income to be over $6 million then.
Most of Obama's income comes from the royalties on two books he has written.
Barack Obama |
$984,000 |
$4,140,000 |
John McCain |
$339,000 |
$387,000 |
Joe Biden |
$249,000 |
$320,000 |
Sarah Palin |
$166,000 |
$128,000 |
Today's Polls
We have five presidential polls today, all of them favoring Barack Obama.
After pulling out of Michigan yesterday, the only Kerry state McCain is fighting for
is New Hampshire. But two new polls don't look encouraging for him. Saint Anselm college
puts him 12 points behind and Rasmussen puts him 10 points behind. Rasmussen also put Obama ahead in
Nevada, 51% to 47%.
We also have four Senate polls. In North Carolina, state senator Kay Hagan (D) continues to have a small
lead over Sen. Elizabeth Dole (R-NC), 37% to 35%. This race was not expected to be close, but the
DSCC has poured a lot of money into North Carolina and it seems to be helping.
In Minnesota, a Princeton Survey poll puts former comedian Al Franken (D) ahead of Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN),
43% to 34%, with independent Dean Barkley at 18%.
Minnesota |
Al Franken |
43% |
Norm Coleman* |
34% |
Sep 30 |
Oct 02 |
Princeton Survey |
North Carolina |
Kay Hagan |
37% |
Elizabeth Dole* |
35% |
Sep 29 |
Oct 02 |
Elon U. |
New Hampshire |
Jeanne Shaheen |
50% |
John Sununu* |
45% |
Oct 01 |
Oct 01 |
Rasmussen |
Virginia |
Mark Warner |
57% |
Jim Gilmore |
31% |
Sep 29 |
Oct 01 |
Mason-Dixon |
We also have 1 House poll and it could be the handwriting on the wall.
NM-02 is a solid (R+6) Republican district. This is the seat Steve Pearce vacated to run for the Senate.
Despite the district's leaning, Democrat Harry Teague is ahead of Republican Edward Tinsley 47% to 43%.
If Republicans are having trouble holding open seats in solid Republican districts, they could be in real
trouble in many other House districts that haven't been polled.
NM-02 |
Harry Teague |
47% |
Edward Tinsley* |
43% |
Sep 30 |
Oct 01 |
Research 2000 |
If you like this Website, tell your friends. You can also share by clicking this button
-- The Votemaster
|
Your donation is greatly appreciated. It will buy ads to publicize the site.
|