Sen. Byrd Dies at 92
Permalink
Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV), the longest serving member of Congress in history,
died
early this morning at a hospital in Fairfax, Virginia.
He was elected to the Senate nine times, starting in 1958, and was majority leader twice as well as chairman
of the powerful Appropriations Committee. Byrd was a member of the Ku Klux Klan in his youth,
and filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act, but since then has apologized thousands of times for his
youthful behavior. In recent years, he has earned a 100% voting record from the NAACP. His trajectory from
humble, racist beginnings to a far more moderate position and author of a four-volume history of the Senate
has been astonishing. He was also famous for always carrying a copy of the U.S. constitution in his pocket
and quoting from it, as well as the Bible and Shakespeare, often.
One of his many obituaries can be found here
It is a pity for the Democrats that Byrd could not hang on for another week. Had he lived until July 3,
2 years and 6 months before the end of his term, then governor Joe Manchin (D-WV) would have appointed a
successor to serve out the rest of his term. But since there are more than 2 years and 6 months left in his
term, Manchin will appoint an interim successor but there will be a special election in November to fill
the seat starting in January. While West Virginia tends to vote Republican in presidential elections,
the other senator, Jay Rockefeller, and Gov. Manchin are both Democrats. Whether the Democrats can hold the seat
depends a lot on who the candidates are. Manchin himself is probably the strongest candidate if he decides to run.
Update Politico has a story
that suggests it is not quite as simple as this since the law does not say when the vacancy occurs. Is it when the
senator dies or when the governor declares a vacancy, a declaration Manchin could delay until next week. Also, the
law is ambiguous about when the special election should be held. It seems incredible that lawmakers can't write a
simple law like how to fill a vacancy without raising many issues. Or maybe it is not incredible.
Update 2 West Virginia's Secretary of State, Natalie Tennant, has
announced
that her reading of West Virginia law is that since the filing date for elections has already passed for 2010,
the special election to fill (the last 5 weeks of) Sen. Byrd's seat will be held in Nov. 2012, along with the
regular election for a full term. Presumably the candidates for the two elections will be the same. Having two
elections is not without consequences since the winner of the special election will be seated before any new
senators elected in 2012, and thus have seniority over them, no small matter in the Senate.
Kagan Hearings Begin Today
Permalink
The hearings to confirm Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court begin today. The hearings give
senators a chance to grandstand and make long speeches instead of asking pointed questiions. Kagan will
invariably say that she will be a scotorobot on the court--law in, decision out, even though she doesn't believe
this for a second and has publicly criticized confirmation hearings in the past.
While many people, especially conservatives, want the Supreme Court to simply follow the constitution, the
reality is that all the easy cases never make it to the Supreme Court. They get all the hard ones, where the
law and constitution give no guidance at all. Consider a
recent case
that landed on the court's docket.
A school in Arizona made a 13-year-old girl take off her bra and panties in the presence of the school nurse
to see if she was hiding Ibuprofen in them. The girl, Savana Redding, was humiliated by the strip search
and sued the school. The case ended up in the Supreme Court. Undoubtedly all the justices scrambled to reread the
fourth amendment, which reads
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The question of whether this search was legal hinges on one word: "unreasonable."
Is it reasonable to strip search a 13-year-old girl looking for a drug that is available over the counter in
every drug store in the country? About what about "probable cause"? Most likely that was meant to apply only to warrants,
but how much evidence do school officials need to conduct a search in the first place? The search was initiated
when a fellow student told a school official that Redding had Ibuprofen on her.
Anyone who can figure out whether the folks who wrote the constitution intended to allow this kind of search must
be clairvoyant. It is perfectly obvious that there is no way for a Supreme Court justice to insert the
constitution in one end of the pipe and have a decision come out of the other. The justice's views on privacy,
society, and a lot more play a major role here and it is clearly within the Senate's authority to ask about the
nominee's views on a wide variety of subjects to get a feeling for how he or she will rule. Yet rather than asking
pointed questions and demanding answers, they tend to blather on endlessly and nominees tend to spout meaningless
platitudes. Such is the confirmation process these days.
No one doubts that Kagan will be confirmed. The Republicans, who probably suspect that Kagan is not going to rule
the way they want most of the time, don't have enough ammunition against her. She has no judicial track record and
barely an academic record. In effect, all they have to go on is that Obama nominated her, which for some is enough
to vote no (just as some Democrats voted no on Bush's appointees, John Roberts and Samuel Alito, as a matter of
principle). But no one expects a filibuster and the votes are there to confirm her.
Buck Leads Norton in Colorado
Permalink
There is a good chance that the tea partiers will be able to claim a third scalp in a top-tier Senate race.
The most recent SurveyUSA poll
shows Weld County District Attorney, Ken Buck, a tea party favorite, leading former Lieutentant Governor Jane Norton (R) 53% to 37%
for the Republican senatorial nomination to face Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) in November.
If Buck wins, he will join Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky and Sharron Angle (R) of Nevada as successful tea party insurgents
who have defeated mainstream Republicans supported by the entire Republican establishment. When the tea partiers
appeared on the scene last summer, they were protesting Obamacare, which has since become law, but in practical
terms, it is Republicans who are bearing the brunt of their anger. While Paul, Angle, and Buck, might win their
respective elections, all are far weaker than the candidates they defeated, giving the Democrats much better chances
to win or hold their seats.
If you like this Website, tell your friends. You can also share by clicking this button
-- The Votemaster
|
Your donation is greatly appreciated. It will buy ads to publicize the site.
|