Massachusetts House Approves Interim Appointment to the Senate
The Massachusetts House has
by a vote of 95 to 58 a change to Massachusetts law allowing the governor to appoint someone to the U.S. Senate
until the winner of the Jan. 19 election is seated. The bill has gone over to the
state Senate, where the 5 Republicans (out of 40 members) are using delaying tactics to
slow it down. Nevertheless, it has a good chance of passing by Thursday, in which case
Gov. Deval Patrick (D-MA) will sign it immediately and probably appoint the senator
immediately as well. Former governor Michael Dukakis is thought to be a likely pick,
but Patrick could surprise people. He will certainly not pull a Paterson and agonize
over his choice publicly for a period of weeks.
Status of the Health-Care Bill
For anyone who has lost track of where we are on the health-care bill, here is a
Three different House committees have reported out health-care bills. All three
contain mechanisms for setting up a public plan, but it would be limited to various
groups of people, and would not kick in immediately.
All the bills contain a mandate for individuals to buy health insurance or pay a fine
and all three provide for government subsidies for poor people who can't afford
insurance. The bills differ on many details and the three chairmen,
George Miller (D-CA), Charlie Rangel (D-NY), and Henry Waxman (D-CA),
are currently working with the White House and Nancy Pelosi to come to one bill which would be
brought to the floor of the House for possible amendments and a vote. The Progressive
Caucus says it will not support a bill without a public option and the Blue Dog
Caucus says it will not support a bill with a public option. Both caucuses are large
enough to defeat the bill. Horse trading and sausage making are going to be on
Over in the Senate, the HELP committee, formerly chaired by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
and currently chaired by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), has already reported out a bill that
includes a public option. The Senate Finance Committee, chaired by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT),
has produced a 223-page bill but not passed it yet. It has something for everyone.
Liberals like the fact that it increases the Medicaid limit up to 133% of the poverty line
and allows small businesses with up to 50 workers to join "exchanges" on which private
insurance companies would offer competitive plans to gain new customers. Furthermore, the
50-worker limit would increase over time, allowing bigger companies to join in.
Conservatives like the fact that there is no government-run public option but does have
individual mandates, forcing everyone in the country to buy private insurance, a huge
windfall for the insurance industry. They also like the absence of any mandate on
companies to provide insurance for their workers, although companies will have to pay a
fine for any workers getting government assistance to pay for health care. This provision
might deter companies from hiring poor people.
A major source of revenue in the Baucus bill is a 35% excise tax on gold-plated
Baucus and every health economist in the country thinks this is a great idea (because
gold-plated plans encourage frivolous use of scarce health-care resources), but everyone else
opposes this provision. However, scotching it leaves a huge gap in the financing
that must be filled.
Next week the Baucus bill will be marked up, meaning
that all 23 members of the committee get to propose amendments which are then voted up or down.
Here is a list
of the committee's members.
With the potential exception of Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), all 10 Republicans on the
committee basically don't want any bill and will try to weaken or scuttle it.
The 13 Democrats want a bill, but they are scattered all over the ideological spectrum,
from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on the left to Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) on the right.
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) has already said he will
on the Baucus bill as it is currently written.
He gave Ezra Klein a good
about heath care as well.
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) has joined Rockefeller and said she will also vote no unless
a public option is added. Without Rockefeller and Cantwell, Baucus doesn't have enough
votes unless he can get Snowe to vote yes.
But according to Rockefeller, the Republican leadership is
bringing down the hammer
on Snowe to vote no. But she is from a blue state and not up for reelection until 2012,
so they have limited ability to pressure her. Also, Schumer is generally to the left
of Rockefeller and Cantwell and if they don't like the bill, he probably likes it even less.
It is hard to guess what will come out of mark-up next week.
A total of 543
were submitted before yesterday's deadline.
Rockefeller submitted one to create a government-run plan.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants employers to offer a choice of at least two plans.
Other amendments deal with the numerology: how poor do you have to be to get a subsidy,
how much should Medicare pay doctors, and so on.
Chances are a bill
will emerge because everyone knows this is not the final step. Once the bill clears
the committee, it has to be merged with the HELP bill, which means that Baucus and
Harkin will have to duke it out, with majority leader Harry Reid and the White House
watching very closely. Then the merged bill will go for a vote to the full Senate.
By then, Massachusetts will probably have a second senator, so the Democrats will have
60 votes and could invoke cloture to shut off debate if they all stick together. It is
possible that Snowe will play an outsized role here. If she votes for the final bill,
this may give cover to conservative Democrats like Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Sen. Mary
Landrieu (D-LA) to vote for it, so it may pass using normal procedures.
Needless to say, this situation gives Snowe enormous leverage to have the bill shaped
the way she wants it, which is sure to displease Senate liberals.
If Snowe does not like the final bill and votes no, some conservative Democrats
may join her in voting no. Then the Democrats would have to use the budget reconciliation
procedure to get the bill through. This requires only 50 votes plus the Vice President,
but the Senate parliamentarian, Alan Frumin, could rule that the bill does not qualify for
reconciliation. However, the Senate could overrule him and even fire him, replacing him
with a more accomodating parliamentarian. This is precisely what happened with the
Bush tax cut bill of 2001. Then-parliamentarian Robert Dove ruled against
the Republicans so majority leader Trent Lott fired him and installed Frumin.
A wild card in all this is the health of Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV), who might not be able
to make it to the Senate to vote. If he felt his absence was dooming health care, though,
he could resign and let Gov. Joe Manchin (D-WV) appoint a new Democrat in his place.
Byrd is not the resigning type, however. If he is technically alive, he'll probably vote.
Once the Senate has passed a bill, the real fun starts. The House and Senate bills
will have to be merged into a single bill that can pass both chambers. A key issue
here is who gets appointed to the conference committee. The Democrats will have the
majority, but a committee featuring Baucus and Waxman could become a real food fight,
as they are miles apart ideologically. If and when a report emerges from the conference,
it goes back to both chambers for approval.
Conference reports are subject to filibuster in the Senate unless there are 60 votes
for cloture or the bill is part of the budget reconciliation process.
At that point pressure will be immense on everyone and there is no telling what might happen.
Presidential Jinx Haunts Virginia Gubernatorial Election
Larry Sabato has a
on the upcoming Virginia gubernatorial election between Bob McDonnell (R) and
Creigh Deeds (D). In the past eight elections for governor of Virginia, the party
holding the White House has lost. Statistically, there is only one chance in 256 this
could have happened by accident. Most likely, it is due to Virginia being something of
a swing-y state and 10 months into the new President's term, some people are unhappy
with him and just vote against his party to make a point, independent of who is running.
Obama Backs Bennet in Colorado Primary
Appointed senator Michael Bennet (D-CO) has gained the
of President Obama in his primary fight with former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff.
This endorsement will certainly help him since Bennet has never run for public office
and has had a very low profile during his half year in the Senate.
The Republican candidate is not known yet, but former lieutenant governor
Jane Norton (R) has recently entered the race and is the likely favorite to get
Paterson Hires Campaign Manager
Despite a recent
showing him with an approval rating of 20%,
Gov. David Paterson (D-NY) has
a campaign manager, Richard Fife, to run his gubernatorial campaign.
Fife was planning to run the senatorial campaign of Rep. Carolyn Maloney against
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), until Maloney was pressured into not running.
Some people don't know when it is time for them to exit stage left.
However, it is well known that New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is interested in Paterson's
job and may challenge him in a primary. If Cuomo, whose father once was governor of
New York, runs, all the polls show that he will bury Paterson in the primary and easily
defeat any Republican in the general election. If Cuomo decides not to run, any one of
several high-profile Republicans, including George Pataki and Rudy Guiliani, has a good
chance of being elected governor. Since New York is likely to lose a congressional
district, redistricting will be needed in 2010 and a Republican governor could prevent
the Democrats, who control the state legislature, from gerrymandering the state to their
If you like this Website, tell your friends. You can also share by clicking this button
-- The Votemaster
Your donation is greatly appreciated. It will buy ads to publicize the site.