There are several interesting stories unfolding on the appointments front. Away we go:
And that's the latest from us. We're working while you're sleeping. (Z)
We have observed, several times, that when you've got a president who is clearly open to bribes, people and corporations will find a way to get that done. We had an item on that very subject last week, as crypto entrepreneur (and banana lover) Justin Sun found a way to give the Trump family $16.5 million.
This is going to be another item on that very subject. One of the griftiest loopholes in American politics is the inauguration committees, wherein corporations and individuals are allowed to make large, poorly monitored donations to an incoming president. This particular opportunity is only going to present itself once, however, and so various entities suspected to be on Donald Trump's "enemies list" are hustling to pony up. Like, say, Amazon.
There are, of course, many ways that Donald Trump could hurt Amazon. There are even more ways that Trump could hurt Amazon's founder and biggest shareholder, Jeff Bezos, whose other company—Blue Origin—has contracts with the government, and aspires to have more. Yesterday, Amazon announced that it would be giving $1 million to Trump's inaugural committee, and would livestream the inauguration as well, a service valued at an additional $1 million. It should be noted, in the interest of completeness, that Amazon made the same offer to Joe Biden in 2020. After all, whether an incoming president is or is not grifty, it's still good to be on their "nice" list come January 20. Biden accepted the livestreaming, but did not take the money, due to a policy of not accepting donations from Big Tech.
Also writing a $1 million check to Trump's inaugural committee is Meta, which owns Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp. Meta, and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg, also don't want the President-elect to make trouble for them. In particular, they do not want ANY federal regulation of social media. Zuckerberg also has some personal skin in the game, as Trump has threatened to imprison him and Trump's acolytes have threatened to do even worse (e.g., force him to attend a Bears game and stay until the very end). Anyhow, in addition to the donation, Zuckerberg made a visit to Mar-a-Lago to dine with the emperor and bow before the throne.
Let us be clear here, we understand exactly why these people are making the choices they are making. We don't admire their lack of spine, and their determination to make certain that they will always have 10,000 times more money than any person could ever spend, but we do understand it. (Z)
Yesterday, Donald Trump was named Time's "Person of the Year" for 2024. That means he is now a two-time member of a distinguished club that also includes Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Vladimir Putin.
Trump sat for an interview with the publication, which Time tries to do whenever possible. We read it, and we would say there are three interesting things about the piece:
All of this said, Trump's answers were overall pretty sharp. It helps that the publication "lightly edited" his remarks for clarity. Also, we suspect they interviewed him early in the day, and not in the late afternoon or evening.
As you can see from the headline, this item is actually about editorial independence, or the lack thereof. Note that we are not interpreting the selection of Trump, per se, as an indicator of Time's being compromised. Recall, the point of the title is to identify the year's biggest newsmaker. In presidential years, it's almost always the winning presidential candidate. In fact, the last time it was NOT the presidential winner was nearly 30 years ago (1996), and even then, they made Bill Clinton a two-timer two years later (appropriately, as a result of his two-timing his wife).
Meanwhile, if Time had put the general rule of "it's the presidential winner" aside, who else could they have picked this year? Putin, or Bashar al-Assad, or Benjamin Netanyahu? Anyone who is cranky about Trump being picked isn't going to like those choices any better. Maybe Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but he was the pick 2 years ago. Maybe Taylor Swift, but she was the pick last year. No, Trump was the obvious choice.
The reason we are looking askance at Time is not because of the selection of Trump, but because of the response of the magazine's billionaire owner, Marc Benioff, on eX-Twitter:
Congratulations to President @realDonaldTrump on being named TIME Person of the Year 2024. This marks a time of great promise for our nation. We look forward to working together to advance American success and prosperity for everyone. May G-d bless the United States of America.
Needless to say, the political establishment and the fourth estate are not supposed to be "working together." If anything, it's supposed to be the opposite. We suppose that Benioff might have chosen his words carelessly, but that's not the explanation favored by Occam's razor, especially since he's enough of a writer to have authored four books.
Also, as long as we're at it, Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong continues to make a mockery of his newspaper. The latest development is that he reportedly quashed an editorial about the shaky quality of some of Trump's Cabinet picks. If the Times' editorial writers are required to handle even the rapist, the probable Russian asset and the vaccine kook with kid gloves, then they might as well just eliminate that section of the paper. How can anyone take the Times' opinion pieces (or its political reporting) seriously as long as Soon-Shiong remains as owner? There are some good people working there (and Z personally knows some of them), but the public isn't going to know it every time he mucks around in the paper's coverage, and so one just has to assume that his fingerprints are on everything. (Z)
Donald Trump is backing off virtually every pledge he made during the election, either substantially watering things down, or outright abandoning ship (see above for an example). The one area where he is still all-in, however, is deportations. Anti-immigrant xenophobia has been the foundation of his entire political career, and he's surrounded himself with anti-immigrant hardliners. He also continues to make very broad, very strong, statements about his deportation plans.
The latest news on this front comes from people in Trump's orbit who spoke to reporters off the record because they are not authorized to speak publicly. At the moment, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has a policy of not arresting people at "sensitive locations"—churches, schools, hospitals, funeral parlors, wedding venues, etc. Reportedly, that policy will be sent to the shredder on Trump's first day in office.
There are at least two obvious reasons that this is part of Trump's plan (beyond the fact that the Heritage Foundation told him to do it). The first of those is that carrying off a deportation on the scale that the President-elect has promised is going to be difficult and expensive. The plan becomes at least a little bit less so if ICE is operating under fewer constraints.
Second, everyone knows how very much Trump likes photo-ops and publicity. Rounding up a bunch of undocumented immigrants in a strawberry field would probably get some attention, but not a lot of it. On the other hand, raiding a school or a church would be big news, and would dominate a news cycle or two. If it was a school, in particular, the administration could say, "See? We are stopping these immigrants from using up our precious education funds!"
There are also a couple of obvious downsides, though. The first is that raiding a school or a church would be big news, and would dominate a news cycle or two. There is no such thing as bad publicity, as the old saying goes, and Trump seems to be a believer in that philosophy. However, remember the pictures of children in cages from 5-6 years ago. Those pictures did not make the Trump administration look "tough" to most people; they made the administration look cruel and heartless. We can very definitely imagine that arresting people at school, or at a hospital, or at a church could backfire on Team Trump.
The second downside has to do with churches, in particular. If ICE hits a few of them, it not only runs the risk of upsetting evangelical voters, but it also brings up some thorny legal issues related to separation of church and state, sanctuary, and other such matters. It may not be well for the Trump administration to end up with years' worth of lawsuits from churches just to score a photo-op or two, where the benefits only last a few days.
Clearly, the incoming administration knows they are treading on thin ice here. That is why the comments to reporters are off the record. Either Team Trump is trying to keep this under its hat, or they're trial ballooning it to see what the reaction is. We will see if this plan goes forward—maybe, but maybe not. (Z)
Last week's theme was a tough one. We ended up giving three hints: (1) "the Harry Potter Baking Championship was on TV while we were putting the theme together"; (2) "we will tell you that both 'Mike' and 'Johnson' work for the theme. So do 'Black' and 'Mirror,' though 'Black' is arguably a bit of a cheat"; and (3) "you need to 'try to understand, try to understand. Oh, oh, try, try, try to understand.'" It was the last one that did it for a lot of readers; here is the solution, courtesy of reader M.H. in Ottawa, ON, Canada:
The theme this week: Names or phrases starting with "magic".
- Trump Nominees: Hegseth Looks to Be a Dead Man Walking—"Magic Man," 1975 song by Heart
- Media Matters: So Much for Speaking Truth to Power—"Magic Power," 1981 song by (Canadian rock band) Triumph
- Does ANYONE Believe This?: Team Trump Says They Don't Have Their Eye on Revenge—Magic Eye, the popular autostereograms from the '90s
- News From the Backbench: Martin May Get the Keys to the DNC Kingdom—"Magic Kingdom," nickname for Disneyland. ("Magic Keys" is a board game which won the Kinderspiel des Jahres in 2024, so maybe that's the alternative?)
- I Read the News Today, Oh Boy: Black Mirror—Magic Mirror, a major character in Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
- It's Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas, Days 4: Mike Johnson—Either possibility works here! Magic Mike, 2012 Steven Soderbergh film starring Channing Tatum, and Magic Johnson, basketball legend
- This Week in Schadenfreude: DeSantis Comes Full Circle?—Magic circle
- This Week in Freudenfreude: Can You Spell I-M-P-E-A-C-H-M-E-N-T?—Magic spell
Actually, the other "dual" answer we intended was not "Magic Keys" but instead "Black magic." As we noted, that's kind of a cheat, because it doesn't follow the same pattern (e.g., word + magic, as opposed to magic + word). And obviously, "dark," from this item's headline, also fits. Needless to say, we apologize for allowing Canadian "culture" to invade the list; we had forgotten about Triumph's origins.
Here are the first 50 readers to get it right:
|
|
After solving the puzzle, D.D. in Carversville added: "And to celebrate, a pizza with mushrooms, after which, we will take a nap on the carpet and let our mind wand...er."
As to this week's theme, it relies on one word per headline, and it fits in the Trivial Pursuit category "Events." For a theme, we'll say that this week's puzzle is rather more similar to last week's than we would like; we were kind of hemmed in by the final headline today.
If you have a guess, send it to comments@electoral-vote.com with subject "December 13 Headlines." (Z)
On one hand, you hate to kick a guy when he's down. On the other hand, the guy in this case is MyPillow Guy Mike Lindell, who spent years harming individual people, as well as democracy in general, and who is now paying the piper.
That's metaphorically paying the piper, mind you, as Lindell does not have the cash to actually pay... well, anyone. His behavior over the past 4-5 years has alienated a huge number of potential customers for medium-quality-at-best pillows. And the problem is that big retailers—Walmart, Target, HomeGoods, etc.—aren't like cable news: They don't cater to just one political faction or the other. So, they dumped him, and Lindell's retail sales have dropped to nearly zero. His mail-order sales are catering to only a fraction of the electorate, many of whom have already bought as much MyPillow product as they can use.
Consequently, in a desperate attempt to keep his once-thriving business afloat, Lindell has taken out a series of increasingly predatory payday-style loans. The reason he was in the news this week is that he has sued to have his latest loan canceled. It's for $1.6 million, at an eye-watering annual interest rate of 409%. And no, we did not forget a decimal in there.
Lindell claims he was tricked by the lender(s), Cobalt Funding Solutions and Streamline Advance. We are skeptical of that claim, especially since Lindell is an inveterate liar. And while we are not experts in this area of the law (or any area of the law, for that matter), his odds of prevailing in the case do not seem great. Assuming he took out the loan in Minnesota, state law says that there is no limit on the interest that may be charged on loans of $100,000 or more.
In any event, you will note that we wrote that Lindell has taken out "loans" not "loan." There's one for $10 million, one for $2 million, one for $600,000, and then this one, for $1.6 million. And those are just the loans that happen to be publicly known because Lindell defaulted on them and the note holder sued. This is what a "death spiral" looks like.
And so, another shady Trumper is about to pay the price for his misdeeds, even if Trump himself appears to be bulletproof. Oh, and note, incidentally, that Lindell has sacrificed everything for Trump, and now that he (Lindell) is down on his luck, Trump is nowhere to be found. Seems like we've heard that story before... (Z)
Yesterday, not too many days removed from pardoning his son, Joe Biden issued 39 pardons and 1,499 commutations. All of the pardons were for non-violent offenders, all of the commutations were for people who qualified for home confinement during the pandemic, and had served out their sentences.
This is being reported as the "biggest single-day act of clemency" in U.S. history. That is true, although it requires drawing a distinction between "clemency" and "amnesty." Acts of clemency are specific to the individual, which means that the White House released a list of 1,538 different names yesterday, treating each as a distinct case. Acts of amnesty cover anyone and everyone who committed whatever offense is being pardoned. For example, George Washington granted amnesty to several thousand participants in the Whiskey Rebellion, a whole bunch of presidents (John Adams, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and Calvin Coolidge) gave amnesty to the deserters of various wars, Lincoln and Andrew Johnson both gave amnesty to various groups of Confederates, Gerald Ford gave amnesty to more than 20,000 Vietnam-era draft dodgers and Jimmy Carter extended that to more than 100,000 additional draft dodgers.
In any event, the United States has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world. And if you just count Western, industrialized democracies, then the U.S. laps the field, with well more than double the rate in #2 Turkey, and well more than quadruple the rate in places like France, the U.K., Italy, Germany, and... Canada. This suggests to us that something is broken; either it's too easy to get convicted of a crime, or the sentences are too harsh, or both.
In any event, 1,538 people now get a clean slate—good for them. That said, they represent the low-hanging fruit, as most of them had already completed their terms. If Biden really wants to roll up his sleeves, he'll take a look at cases where a miscarriage of justice is strongly indicated. The White House promised that more pardons are coming; we look forward to seeing what that means. (Z)
Last day of this question from reader T.B. in Powell, OH: "Imagine you were going to give a Christmas gift to the United States. Specifically, a law, institution, initiative, civic structure, or like commodity imported from some other nation. What gift would you bestow?"
We didn't have a chance to compile a list yesterday, so we're going with ten answers instead of six today:
Next week, the question is: What picture or image would you suggest appear on this year's Christmas (or Hanukkah) card from...
Make sure to send an image! Explainer text is welcome, but you can also let your chosen image stand on its own. And have a good weekend, all! (Z)