As expected, Speaker-designate Jim Jordan (R-OH) forced a second floor vote for speaker yesterday. And, as expected, he came up short.
When all was said and done, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) got the same 212 votes that he got on Tuesday. Jordan picked up one vote from a member who was absent on Tuesday (Gus Bilirakis, R-FL), flipped two non-Jordan votes (Doug LaMalfa, R-CA and Victoria Spartz, R-IN), and saw four votes turn against him (Vern Buchanan, R-FL; Drew Ferguson, R-GA; Mariannette Miller-Meeks, R-IA; and Pete Stauber, R-MN). That's +1, +2, -4, for a net of -1. Put another way, Jordan dropped from 200 votes on Tuesday to 199 on Wednesday. This is known, to use some technical jargon, as "heading in the wrong direction."
The non-Jordan votes are all over the place. There have been Republican votes for former speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA), former speaker John Boehner, former representative Lee Zeldin (R-NY), and Reps. Mike Garcia (R-CA), Tom Emmer (R-MN), Tom Cole (R-OK), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Candice Miller (R-MI), Byron Donalds (R-FL), Kay Granger (R-TX), and Bruce Westerman (R-AR). Here's a list of every Republican member who voted for a candidate other than Jordan at least once this week:
Member | District | Dist. PVI | Biden 18? | Round One | Round Two |
Don Bacon | NE-02 | EVEN | Yes | McCarthy | McCarthy |
Vern Buchanan | FL-16 | R+7 | No | Jordan | Donalds |
Ken Buck | CO-04 | R+13 | No | Emmer | Emmer |
Lori Chavez-DeRemer | OR-05 | D+2 | Yes | McCarthy | McCarthy |
Anthony D'Esposito | NY-04 | D+5 | Yes | Zeldin | Zeldin |
Mario Diaz-Balart | FL-26 | R+8 | No | Scalise | Scalise |
Jake Ellzey | TX-06 | R+15 | No | Garcia | Garcia |
Drew Ferguson | GA-03 | R+18 | No | Jordan | Scalise |
Andrew Garbarino | NY-02 | R+3 | No | Zeldin | Zeldin |
Carlos Giménez | FL-28 | R+2 | No | McCarthy | McCarthy |
Tony Gonzales | TX-23 | R+5 | No | Scalise | Scalise |
Kay Granger | TX-12 | R+12 | No | Scalise | Scalise |
John James | MI-10 | R+3 | No | Cole | Miller |
Mike Kelly | PA-16 | R+13 | No | Scalise | Boehner |
Jennifer Kiggans | VA-02 | R+2 | Yes | McCarthy | McCarthy |
Nick LaLota | NY-01 | R+3 | Yes | Zeldin | Zeldin |
Doug LaMalfa | CA-01 | R+12 | No | McCarthy | Jordan |
Mike Lawler | NY-17 | D+3 | Yes | McCarthy | McCarthy |
Mariannette Miller-Meeks | IA-01 | R+3 | No | Jordan | Granger |
John Rutherford | FL-05 | R+11 | No | Scalise | Scalise |
Mike Simpson | ID-02 | R+14 | No | Scalise | Scalise |
Victoria Spartz | IN-05 | R+11 | No | Massie | Jordan |
Pete Stauber | MN-08 | R+8 | No | Jordan | Westerman |
Steve Womack | AR-03 | R+15 | No | Scalise | Scalise |
We understand the statement being made by the members who are voting Scalise and McCarthy. We understand much less the point of voting for, say, Westerman or Granger.
In any event, what exactly is keeping Jordan from making it over the hump? Well, Don Bacon (R-NE), whose wife was obliquely threatened by one or more anonymous Jordan supporters, has voted against Jordan twice and was chortling yesterday that the wannabe speaker has "hit a brick wall" after "harassing our spouses." Meanwhile, Miller-Meeks, who was one of the new anti-Jordan votes, told reporters that she had received death threats after withdrawing her support for Jordan, and that she's working with the authorities to try to find the responsible parties.
In short, it sure looks like the Ohioan has burned his bridges with some of his colleagues. Actually, "burned his bridges" is probably putting it mildly. He's smashed the bridges into pieces, burned the pieces, buried the ashes 20 feet down, and then poured two tons of concrete on top. Point is, those bridges ain't coming back. Indeed, we cannot conceive of what he might do to flip 16-18 of the anti-Jordan votes. Consider again all of his liabilities:
What on earth could he possibly say to assuage concerns over any one of these things? Much less all of them? And the word is that in the next vote, currently planned for today, he is going to lose even more votes.
Given that Jordan looks to be toast, there is much discussion among members of the Republican conference about who might be the next candidate to put themselves through the wringer. All of the dozen names being bandied about are men, and all but one of them (Donalds) is white. This political party is not what you would call diverse, particularly in its upper ranks, although we are surprised that Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) isn't getting at least some buzz. The only thing that is clear is that while Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry (R-NC) might be given additional (temporary) powers, he has said he is not interested in the permanent job.
Since we're running out of things to say about Jordan, as he flails around, we thought we would try to think of solutions to the Republicans' problem. We've already written about the possibility of reaching across the aisle, but apparently that's more distasteful to the members of the House Republican Conference than drinking cow urine soda while having one's nether regions connected to an electric socket as the complete works of Michael Bolton play in the background. So, as we try to think creatively, we operate under the assumption that the Republicans must pick a member of their own party to be speaker, it must be accomplished with Republican votes only, but it cannot be achieved the normal way. Here are three out-of-the-box ideas:
None of these things is likely to come to pass, of course. Not only are these screwball solutions, but they would also require the Freedom Caucusers to abide by the decisions of the group. If the FCers were able to do that, then either Kevin McCarthy or Steve Scalise would be speaker right now.
That said, there is one bullet that is still in the chamber, and that nobody seems to be talking about. It only takes 110 votes to kick someone out of the House Republican Conference. And if a member is booted from the Conference, they lose their committee assignments. This threat could certainly be used to impose a little party discipline on members who would be able to do far less grandstanding if they no longer had committee meetings to grandstand in (ahem, Mr. Jordan).
Incidentally, speaking of off-the-wall solutions, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA), a moderate, has a pretty wild suggestion for a "compromise" speaker. He proposes... George W. Bush. That is a suggestion that illustrates two things, in roughly equal measure. First, 15 years affords a lot of opportunity to forget the bad. If a Democrat had made that suggestion in 2010, he would likely have been drummed out of the party. Second, while Bush was plenty extreme by the standards of his day, the Republican Party has moved far enough to the right that he kinda does pass for a moderate now.
Anyhow, we shall see what today brings. Could be anything, but probably not Speaker Jim Jordan. Or Speaker George W. Bush. (Z)
You have to assume that once House Republicans figure out what to do with the speakership, some dominoes are going to fall. Some folks who did not back an extremist are likely to draw primary challenges from the right, while some folks who did back an extremist are likely to draw a primary challenge from the center. Although, with the dynamics of today's GOP, the former is more likely than the latter.
Yesterday, with the speakership far from settled, the first politician made their move. Navy veteran Phil Ehr (D) was going to try to knock off Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL), but then Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-FL) jumped into that race, backed by the Democratic establishment. So, Ehr just announced that he'll shoot for the House instead, and will take on Carlos Giménez in the very purple FL-08. Ehr's thinking is that in vocally supporting Donald Trump and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), but opposing Jordan, Giménez will have alienated the Republican base, and many of them won't vote for him on Election Day.
It's an interesting theory, and certainly Ehr has a better chance of beating Giménez than he does of beating Mucarsel-Powell and then turning around and beating Scott. We really don't think things will work out the way that Ehr is hoping, but you can't blame him for trying. In any event, it's a reminder that the speaker situation is likely to generate a lot of moves and counter-moves, particularly once someone actually has the gavel. (Z)
We guessed that Joe Biden might sneak into Israel a little early, so as to throw an additional curveball for any hostiles who wish him ill. He did not do that, by all indications, but he did spend 7 hours there, including a lengthy meeting with Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, before heading home.
Biden's trip happened against the backdrop of the hospital explosion in Gaza, a tragedy that certainly upended much of the President's plans. Initial reports pinned the blame on the Israeli military. Now, U.S. intelligence sources believe it was actually a missile fired by Palestinian Islamic Jihad. It was apparently accidental that the bomb landed where it did... in case that makes it better.
Here are five positives for Biden from the trip:
And here are five negatives:
Many of Biden's advisers wanted him to skip the trip, but he was steadfast, and really, he probably had to go. That said, the incredibly tricky nature of this particular bit of foreign policy is indicated by all the infighting that's going on within the Democratic Party. For example, the Democratic Socialists of America put out a statement that was dangerously close to being pro-Hamas, causing Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI) to quit the organization, while the DSA's most prominent member, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) condemned the statement as "bigotry and callousness." Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is furious that Israel was blamed for the hospital being blown up, but Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) still blames the Israelis (and Joe Biden), accusing them of perpetuating genocide. Thanks for helping to cheapen that word, Rashida. A mid-level State Department official named Josh Paul resigned loudly in protest of the President's decisions regarding the provision of arms to Israel. And these are just a few examples.
Tonight, Biden will try his best to get his party and his country on the same page, with an Oval Office address in which he will request about $100 billion in funding for Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and securing the Mexican border. In other words, there's something there for everyone to like, and something there for everyone to dislike. He's going to need to come up with a heck of a speech if he hopes to get that kind of cash. (Z)
If states are the laboratories of democracy, per Louis Brandeis, where new ideas can be tested, improved, and propagated, then surely it must also be the case that states can be places where old ideas, including some good ones, can be lit on fire, and burned to a crisp.
As a case in point, we give you the state of North Carolina, which has been moving in a decidedly dictatorial-fascist direction for a while, and which really put the pedal to the floor in the last few weeks. Among the changes wrought by the GOP-controlled legislature:
We wish we could write that there's hope that these obviously undemocratic maneuvers will be undone, but hope is pretty slim at the moment. Cooper and other Democrats have sued to block the new election-management law, but it's 50/50 at best that they will prevail. There's little that can be done about the secret police, and the U.S. Supreme Court has already given indications that a gerrymandered map is A-OK, as long as it's not a racial gerrymander. How one can tell the difference between the "non-racial" gerrymander in North Carolina (23% Black) and the "racial" gerrymander in Alabama (31% Black), we do not know. Nor does anyone else seem to know, either. (Z)
There are three things that are true right now: (1) The writing staff is actually a solo operation until Sunday, due to travel; (2) It's been a downer of a week, news-wise; and (3) the news is very top-heavy, with nearly everything being about Israel or the Jim Jordan circus. So, it's time to return to some content that moved to the back burner, namely the scavenger hunt that was launched on July 4.
As a reminder, these were the prompts:
And now, in hopes that it lightens the day a bit, some pithy political quotes:
We shall have some more tomorrow, and then we'll continue with our fall cleaning (fall clearance?) next week. There are some pretty darn good Trump/DeSantis/Clinton jokes in the hopper, among other things, and we also have a fair bit of other stuff that is on the back burner that we want to get to. (Z)