An open letter signed by 1,100 former federal prosecutors and Dept. of Justice officials, including former deputy AGs, assistant deputy AGs, and other high-ranking officials condemns AG William Barr for interfering in Roger Stone's sentencing and calls on him to resign. The letter says that when the AG helps a president be lenient to his convicted friends, we no longer have a constitutional republic, but an autocracy.
The letter also called on Dept. of Justice employees to be on the lookout for more political interference in the administration of justice and to report it to the DoJ inspector general and to Congress. Barr chastised Trump for interfering in Stone's case, but his lament would have been a lot more believeable had he refused to do Trump's bidding and let the original sentence recommendations stand.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson gets to make the final call and it is doubtful that she will be influenced by what Trump, Barr, and the Dept. of Justice want. She knows all the facts of the case and the law and can't be removed from office by Trump or Barr. Only Congress can do that, and they are most certainly not going to do so, especially since an impeachment proceeding has to start in the House.
What happens next is up to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). She could have the House Judiciary Committee request that the four prosecutors who withdrew from the Stone case on account of Barr's interference testify in public before the Committee. If they say that Barr's interference rises to the level of an impeachable offense, the House could impeach Barr. It is very unlikely that Barr would be convicted, but it's not impossible. This could be a way for Republican senators to send a useful message to fence-sitting voters and/or to the President without directly challenging the throne. If not, forcing half a dozen endangered Republican senators to once again take a tough vote could help the Democrats capture the Senate in 2020. Pelosi is an extremely shrewd poltician, of course, and will make a decision largely based on whether she thinks going after Barr will help or hurt the Democrats in the 2020 elections. (V)
Nevada Caucus volunteers have told Politico that the sudden decision to drop the reporting app that malfunctioned in Iowa didn't leave enough time to get an alternative plan debugged. Caucus workers haven't had adequate training about how to report their results, and some haven't even been trained to run a caucus site. Also a concern is the security of the Internet connection that will be used to report the results back to the Democrats' "war room," where they will be tallied.
After the Iowa app was scuttled, Nevada Democrats tried out a couple of other apps and eventually gave up. The current plan is to use a spreadsheet from Google docs and have caucus workers fill in the spreadsheet on party iPads—a task for which they have not (yet) been trained.
It goes without saying (but we are going to say it anyway) that another caucus debacle would mean the Democratic race would remain in turmoil at least until South Carolina's primary a week after the Nevada caucus, on Feb. 29. But that is only 3 days before Super Tuesday. It would also mean that neither party will ever hold a caucus again, except for Wyoming's on April 4th, and those in four U.S. territories later in the Spring. North Dakota has what is called a "firehouse caucus," but that is actually a primary election run by the Democratic Party.
The Democrats have built some safeguards into the system, though. In addition to uploading the Google spreadsheet to the war room, the chair of each caucus will call up to report the results via a secure hotline. The operator there will check to make sure the phoned in results match the spreadsheet, to detect any errors or hacking. What could go wrong?
Well, to start with, some of the elderly caucus workers may be in awe of having a shiny new iPad in their hands, having heard about these marvelous devices from their grandchildren, but never having actually used one. Unfortunately, it is not likely that their grandchildren have taught them to use a Google docs spreadsheet. If one knows Excel well, using Google's spreadsheet isn't so hard, but not everyone in rural Nevada is an Excel guru. And Nevada has 2,000 caucus sites, so if just 100 people completely screw up, there will be mayhem.
And we don't even want to start on the threats to the process if grandpa decides to use the local WiFi service, instead of the cellular service the Party has contracted for, because WiFi is faster. The phone reporting system may very well catch hackers who have taken over the local WiFi, but resolving conflicts between the spreadsheet and the phoned in results could take time and if the results are delayed for a week, it will look like the Democrats are totally incompetent.
To make it worse, the caucus instructions are ambiguous. One key point is whether the supporters of candidates deemed nonviable in the first round can join together to revive one of the other candidates. For example, if Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) gets 12% and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (DFL-MN) gets 10%, can their supporters band together to support one of the women in the second round, or do they have to migrate to one of the viable candidates?
In short, Nevada Democrats have less than a week to get their act together, and that may be a tall order. If they botch it, it is possible that future historians will write: "Donald Trump was reelected in 2020 because the Democrats were incapable of writing an app to count the votes." All of this brings to mind Will Rogers' famous answer to the question: "Are you a member of some organized political party?" to which he replied: "No, I'm not a member of any organized political party. I'm a Democrat." (V)
Michael Bloomberg's problems with black voters are well known, stemming from his infamous stop-and-frisk policy in New York, which basically told the police to profile young, black men. But Bloomberg, who often spoke his mind on other controversial topics, also had had things to say about women that wouldn't have passed muster back when he said them, and certainly won't now. On his birthday in 1990, a top aide handed him a 32-page booklet of profane quotes about women as a present. If he is the Democratic nominee, the Republicans might insert the entire booklet in toto into the GOP platform. It will certainly figure in all of their ads.
Kellyanne Conway is starting to give it a practice run, just in case. Yesterday she told Fox News' Chris Wallace that Bloomberg's remarks are fair game, despite the fact that Donald Trump's comments about grabbing women by the pu**y are even worse. She said Bloomberg created a workplace that was unsafe for women. Then she (ominously) added: "I think you're going to hear more of it."
And not all of it may come from Kellyanne. On "Meet the Press" yesterday, Joe Biden said: "$60 billion can buy you a lot of advertising, but it can't erase your record." Biden is clearly worried that if he has a middling showing in Nevada and barely ekes out a win in South Carolina, then many of the party pooh-bahs are going to leave him like rats leaving a sinking ship. Quite a few may decide that Bloomberg is their best hope, in no small part because he can outspend Trump 5-to-1 or more if he wants to. So Biden is already trying to take Bloomberg down, just in case. (V)
The DNC changed the rules for getting on stage for the next debate, which will take place on Wednesday in Las Vegas, 3 days before the Nevada caucuses. The donor threshold has been dropped entirely, which potentially opens the door to former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who doesn't accept donations. Note that word "potentially." To actually make the cut, he has to register above 10% in one more national poll. He has already come in above 10% in three national polls, but he needs a fourth one to qualify.
Qualifying would be a mixed blessing at best. It would give Bloomberg some free publicity and perhaps introduce him live to a national audience that has up until now seem him only in campaign videos. Donald Trump calls Bloomberg "mini Mike," and indeed, Bloomberg, at 5'8", is shorter than Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), both of them 6'0" and also shorter than Pete Buttigieg, who is 5'9". In fact, Bloomberg is the same height as the two women who will be on stage, Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren. But height isn't Bloomberg's biggest problem. He is largely free of charisma and would undoubtedly come under attack from Sanders and Warren for trying to buy the nomination. His strength, which is having very talented and expensive teams of people make ads for him, is of no use in a debate setting. He probably secretly hopes he won't have to face the other Democrats on stage before Super Tuesday, but his spokeswoman said if he qualifies, he will be there.
Even if Bloomberg is not on stage, though, the other Democrats are likely to take potshots at him, Sanders and Warren have an ideological bone to pick with him and the others surely realize that they will be competing with him for centrist voters on Super Tuesday. His absence is likely to encourage them to go after him, since he won't be there to respond. For practice, Bernie Sanders said yesterday that Bloomberg is incapable of producing the excitement needed to get the base to the polls. There's some truth in that, of course, but Bloomberg could mitigate that somewhat by putting a black woman on the ticket with him.
If Bloomberg fails to make the Nevada debate, he might still make the one in South Carolina, since the criteria are the same. And that debate will be the last one before Super Tuesday. (V)
Joe Biden is hoping that South Carolina will throw him a lifeline in order to save his floundering campaign. A few months ago, which in politics is like saying "back in the Jurassic Period," Biden had an insurmountable lead in the Palmetto State, largely due to the fact that 60% of the state's Democrats are black and they loved him. A new Quinnipiac University poll shows his support among black South Carolina voters has dropped precipitously, from 59% before the Iowa caucuses to 27% now. Not a good sign.
On top of that, a new article from Politico, written after talking to dozens of lawmakers, consultants, and voters in South Carolina, indicates that Biden may not coast to the landslide victory he was hoping for. Some black leaders have dropped Biden and moved on to Bernie Sanders or Tom Steyer, who has bet the farm on the state. One of them, Dahli Myers, vice chair of the Richland County Council, said that she switched to Sanders because Biden's strategy was too tailored for old voters. Others pointed out that his message of going back to a pre-Trump America isn't very inspiring for voters of any age. And, of course, his message that he is the most electable candidate took a tremendous hit in Iowa and then again in New Hampshire. After all, if Democrats won't even vote for you, how can expect independents and moderate Republicans to do so?
Another problem is entirely of Biden's own making. He has barely been in the state campaigning. Maybe he will show up after Nevada votes, but it might be too little, too late. In contrast, Steyer has practically taken up residence in South Carolina and has a large staff on the ground talking to voters every day. Biden doesn't. Still, Biden has a reservoir of good will there due to his being Barack Obama's veep, but just because people think kindly of him doesn't mean they will vote for him. (V)
Amy Klobuchar is just starting to come into her own, and the timing may be perfect. Democrats are desperate for a candidate who can beat Donald Trump and all the other main contenders have one or more serious flaws:
Klobuchar is probably the only Democrat in the mix that nobody really dislikes and that doesn't have any serious liabilities. The news story from 2019 that she is tough on her staff is something she can use as a talking point, as in "When dealing with nasty people like Putin, you have to be tough." As a consequence of her strong debate performance in New Hampshire and third-place finish there, Democrats are starting to take a good look at her. They are also throwing money her way. She has raised $12 million since the New Hampshire debate, which is more than she raised in the entire 4th quarter of 2019. Of that amount, $2.5 million came in on the day after the New Hampshire primary. Peaking just as the voting is getting underway is every politician's dream.
Another thing that Klobuchar has going for her is that she will be tough for Trump to mock. She doesn't have any obvious characteristics that lend themselves to that, other than her being tough, which could easily backfire if she hits him for licking Putin's boots. If she wants to hit him hard, she could say: "My goal is to serve the American people, not build a big tower in Moscow." Trump might not even be able to come up with a pejorative nickname for her that sticks.
Also going for her is her track record of winning in red counties by getting Republicans to vote for her. For those Democrats whose top priority is beating Trump, that could be a selling point.
While $12 million is a lot of money, she has to decide how much to dump into Nevada and South Carolina and how much to save for Super Tuesday, where $12 million is the rough equivalent of "zero." Probably her best strategy is to spend half in Nevada and half in South Carolina in the hopes of coming in second or third in them. That would boost her campaign more than finishing fourth or fifth there and buying a handful of ads in California, Texas, and North Carolina. (V)
While the Democrats are busy shooting at each other, Donald Trump headed for the track at the Daytona 500 NASCAR race yesterday. Yup, he drove around the track in "The Beast." Well, his Secret Service chauffeur did the actual driving, but he was in the "Beast" waving to supporters. Then after going around the track once, he spoke the famous words: "Gentlemen, start your engines." About 100,000 people showed up for the race in the key swing state of Florida, many of them the noncollege men who form his base.
Trump isn't the first president to show up at the Daytona 500, one of the top NASCAR races. Ronald Reagan and both Bushes also showed up at Daytona for other races, but George W. Bush was the only previous president to show up for the Daytona 500. Sunday afternoon, Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale tweeted out a photo showing the impressively large size of the crowd that showed up to see Trump. One small problem, though: The photo was actually from the Bush visit back in 2004. Oops! To his credit, we suppose, Parscale deleted the tweet instead of gesticulating wildly and insisting that Trump's Daytona 500 crowd was larger than Bush's. Period.
After spending the weekend at his new legal home at Mar-a-Lago, Trump will head out to the West this week for campaigning and fund raising. (V)
Housing prices in the major cities of California are sky high and are forcing many people to leave the Golden State. In fact, 7 million have left since 2007. The political question here is: Do they bring their California values (and votes for the Democrats) with them, or do they take on the characteristics of their newly adopted (and generally redder) state? Timothy Egan has taken a look at this and concluded that they remain Democrats no matter where they go and that, consequently, is making their new home states bluer.
For example, 500,000 Californians have moved to nearby Nevada between 2008 and 2018. In that period, Nevada went from being a swing state to a fairly reliable blue state. Democrats won the presidential election there in 2012 and 2016. Both senators and three of the four representatives are Democrats. Also, the governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer, controller, and AG are all Democrats. The only statewide elected Republican is the secretary of state, and she won in 2018 by 6,000 votes out of 1 million cast.
Another state Californians like to migrate to is Colorado, which is also a former swing state turned solidly blue. In the past two presidential elections, the Democrat won by over 100,000 votes. Many observers expect that Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) is going to lose in 2020, meaning that both senators will then be Democrats. Four of the seven House members are Democrats. All five of the statewide elected officers, from the governor on down, are Democrats.
The next to fall could be Arizona, another popular destination for Californians. Donald Trump carried the state in 2016 by 91,000 votes out of 2.6 million, but Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) picked up John McCain's Senate seat in 2018, and many observers expect Democrat Mark Kelly to win the other seat this year.
One state popular with former Californians that is not going blue in 2020 is Texas. Democrats have big majorities in Dallas, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, but that is not enough to offset the Republican majorities in the rural areas. Still, Beto O'Rourke came within 3 points of beating Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) in 2018. While Texas is probably safe for the GOP this year, if migration from California keeps up at its current pace, Texas could become a swing state as early as 2024. If Texas were to become bluish by 2028, Republicans would be in deep doodoo. If Hillary Clinton had won Texas in 2016, she would have won the most electoral votes and been elected president. Republicans know that without Texas, they have almost no chance to win the White House, but the only way they can solve the problem is to divert the Great Wall of Trump from the Mexican border to Texas' western border to keep Californians out. And getting Texas to pay for it, might not actually be so difficult. (V)
Our Christmas in Washington quiz was well received, and we can hardly allow Presidents' Day to pass without a mention of some sort. So, we present a Presidents' Day quiz. 10 multiple choice questions; answers at the end.
Quiz Answers
Another tricky one, again written by someone who's pretty good at writing tricky quizzes. If you got as many as four right, you should give yourself a pat on the back. (Z)