Jul. 29

Click for www.electoral-vote.com

New Senate: DEM 48             GOP 52

New polls:  
Dem pickups: (None)
GOP pickups: (None)

Previous | Next

Score: Mooch 1, Reince 0

After Anthony "Mooch" Scaramucci viciously attacked White House chief of staff Reince Priebus this week, it was clear the White House wasn't big enough for both of them. Donald Trump has now made a decision, and it is Priebus who has to go. The new chief of staff is Gen. John Kelly (ret.), up until now the secretary of homeland security. As chief of staff, he does not need to be confirmed by the Senate. The new secretary of DHS does need to be confirmed, of course.

Trump never liked or trusted Priebus, and is happy to be rid of him. To a large extent, he was foisted upon Trump by the Republican establishment, which wanted an "adult" in charge of the White House. Trump likes Kelly, in part due to the general's strong defense of Trump's Muslim travel bans. Also important is that first son-in-law Jared Kushner likes Kelly as well. Another plus for Kelly is that he gets along with Steve Bannon, a former Navy officer. However, Kelly comes with a built-in disadvantage from Bannon's point of view: Bannon always saw Priebus as a weakling he could push around, but Kelly is a retired four-star Marine Corps general. Those guys don't get pushed around easily.

Scaramucci successfully got rid of one person (Priebus) who was a problem for him. Now it looks like a twofer, as he is also parting ways with someone else who doesn't like him so much: his (second) wife. Deidre Ball was tired of Scaramucci's naked ambition and is no fan of Trump, so she has filed for divorce. They have been married for 3 years and have two children. Nothing like being hit with a divorce suit after you have been on a new very high-profile job for only a week.

There is one potential downside of Trump's firing Priebus. Priebus is now unemployed and certainly can't go back to the RNC (which he once ran), since that slot is being filled by Mitt Romney's niece, Ronna Romney. So how does he earn some money to live on? One thought that might pop into his head is write a tell-all memoir about his time in the White House. After all, he knows where the skeletons are buried. In fact, he even knows where they are still walking around. And reportedly, he's one of the few White House insiders who did not sign a non-disclosure agreement. Could he get a six- or seven-figure advance on such a book? Stay tuned. (V)

Trump's Staffing Woes Can Only Get Worse

Here is how the New York Post portrayed the Trump administration on its front page yesterday:

NY Post Survivor

There is much truth here—the members of the Trump administration have to constantly watch their backs for fear of getting stabbed, and today's ally could be tomorrow's enemy (if they're not tossed off the island first). Very few people not named Gordon Gekko find this kind of work environment appealing, and would willingly choose to subject themselves to such pressure for multiple years.

And then, of course, there is the President, and his constantly-shifting moods and loyalties. Let's consider the few categories of people he seems to be unwilling to throw under the bus:

Let's see, that's family and friends of the president, military elites, and the ultra-rich. That sounds very much like the government of a banana republic. Or North Korea. In any event, these are all fairly limited commodities. Trump's already got most of his family and friends working in the administration, and there are only so many military officers and/or ultra-rich people in the country. So these "hiring pools" are close to being tapped out.

Meanwhile, let's look at the groups for whom Trump has little regard:

The most interesting case study is Mike Pence. There's no real evidence that Pence enjoys Trump's confidence or his loyalty, given that Pence hasn't been terribly helpful getting things through Congress, that he isn't wealthy, and that Trump and Pence don't see eye-to-eye on much of anything (like, say, religion). Further, it's only a matter of time until the President realizes that his VP is laying the groundwork for his own presidential run, perhaps as soon as 2020. On the other hand, Pence is the one guy who can't be fired or compelled to resign (probably), so Trump has to be circumspect. This means that they will probably spend the next few years largely ignoring one another.

In any event, Trump is now lagging far, far behind his predecessors when it comes to staffing his administration. By this time, George H. W. Bush had filled three times as many jobs (162) as Trump has (51), while George W. Bush (208), Bill Clinton (214), and Barack Obama (228) had filled four times as many. All of the drama, and all of Trump's well-established patterns, are going to make it very hard to catch up anytime soon. Anyone who is not a family member, friend, general, or wealthy tycoon would, to be blunt, be crazy to put themselves in the hands of a man demands loyalty but rarely gives it. For the same reasons, it's also likely that the exodus does not stop with Spicer and Priebus. (Z)

Republican Blame Game Begins

Whose fault is it that more than 6 months into President Donald Trump's term, the 7-year dream of the Republican Party to end the ACA has ended in failure? Jack Kennedy said that victory has a thousand fathers but defeat is an orphan. With respect to the late great health care bill, defeat has a thousand fathers—strike that, make it nine, two of whom are actually mothers. The finger pointing is only beginning. Here are some of the early front runners:

As is so often the case, with any complex real-world event (e.g., Hillary Clinton's loss in 2016), there are many causes, the absence of any one of which could have moved the needle the other way. But we'll never know.

Well, we'll probably never know. There is a small chance that the Republicans will get a do-over. Suppose McCain dies within a year and Gov. Doug Ducey (R-AZ) appoints a conventional Republican to fill his seat. McConnell could bring the "skinny repeal" bill back up again and maybe get it through on the second try. Of course, then a House-Senate conference committee would have to come up with something that could pass both chambers. (V)

Takeaways from the Health-Care Fiasco

The Republicans' failure to repeal and replace Obamacare is going to have a lot of repercussions down the road. The Hill has compiled a list of five major things to take away from the debacle:

It takes a while for things to crystallize, but it already seems clear that this was a big win for the Democrats and big loss for the Republicans. It will be a big morale booster for the blue team and a painful loss for the red team. (V)

LePage: Collins Is Running for Governor

Gov. Paul LePage (R-ME) has said that Sen. Susan Collins is running to replace him in 2018 (he's term limited). That could explain her opposition to all the Republican health-care bills this year. Maine is a fairly blue state and if she runs for a new office, she won't have the advantage of incumbency that she has in her Senate races. To win the governor's mansion she will need a fair number of Democratic votes. So how does a Republican gets Democratic votes in a blue state? How about opposing the Republicans' health-care bills?

Collins isn't up in 2018, so she can run for governor without giving up her Senate seat. If she wins, she becomes governor. If she loses, she can stay a senator. Of course if she wins, she will have to resign her Senate seat, something she is likely to do a few minutes after being sworn in as governor. Who would appoint the new senator? Governor Collins, of course. Since she is a Republican, she is very likely to appoint another Republican to her seat. The obvious candidate is Rep. Bruce Poliquin (R-ME), although he is more conservative than she is. If she wants someone who is less conservative than Poliquin, she could pick a state senator or representative, of course. (V)

Can a Pardon Be Questioned?

Donald Trump has pointed out that he has absolute authority in the matter of pardoning people, at least for federal crimes (but not state crimes). But when someone is pardoned, the story doesn't always stop there. In particular, when Bill Clinton pardoned fugitive oil trader Marc Rich on the his last day in office, alarms went off all over the place, including in the office of U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White, a Clinton appointee. She acted on a hunch that Rich had bribed Clinton directly or indirectly and launched an investigation of the matter. Certainly, Rich's wife gave generously (seven figures) to the Democratic Party and to the Clintons' various political campaigns. Five years later, the Justice Dept. gave up for lack of hard evidence. There might have been a corrupt bargain, but absent evidence that could be used in court, there was no case.

Congress got into the act as well, with some of the members egging the Justice Dept. on. One of them said: "If a person takes a thing of value for themself [sic] or for another person that influences their decision in a matter of their official capacity, then that could be a criminal offense." Of course, any other criminal motive (such as obstruction of justice) would also qualify, not just a direct bribe. Who said that? A senator named Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. It might be interesting to get him on the record now as to whether a pardon could be a criminal act. (V)

Congress Passes Bill to Sanction Russia; Trump Will Sign It

By huge margins, both chambers of Congress have now passed a bill to increase sanctions on Russia and sent it to Donald Trump. The President, recognizing that a veto would be overridden, thus dealing him another embarrassing defeat, has decided to sign it. In a statement, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said:

President Donald J. Trump read early drafts of the bill and negotiated regarding critical elements of it. He has now reviewed the final version and, based on its responsiveness to his negotiations, approves the bill and intends to sign it."

This is an obvious attempt to save face, since—besides the acknowledgment that he's going to sign the bill—there's likely nothing here that's actually true. Trump doesn't get involved in negotiating things with Congress, nor does he read early drafts or review final drafts of legislation. And he certainly doesn't "approve" of measures that take power away from him. Further, if he was involved in the process, why haven't we heard a word about it until now? The White House's only comments on the matter before Friday had been to denigrate the measure.

These developments are very displeasing to Vladimir Putin, who certainly thought he had helped put a useful stooge in the White House. Even before Trump signaled that he would sign the bill, the Russians fired a shot across the bow, seizing a warehouse and a public park used by the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, and ordering the U.S. to reduce the number of diplomatic personnel in the country to 455—the exact number Russia has in the U.S.—by September 1. The U.S. mission to Russia currently numbers over 1,200 people, so this would reduce staffing by over 60%

There isn't much more that the Russians can do to strike back within the borders of their own country, but depending on how aggravated Putin is, he could start looking for opportunities to challenge the U.S. elsewhere. Eastern Ukraine, for example, or Syria, or even the South China Sea. If Vlad really wants to play dirty, some of the kompromat that he has stockpiled on Trump might just leak out. All of this is a major headache for the President, and explains why he badly wanted to avoid a sanctions bill, and also why it's highly improbable he would have participated in shaping such a bill.

All of this comes, of course, as the Russiagate business grows grimmer by the day for the President. Special counsel Mueller is still at work looking at Russia's meddling in the election, Donald Trump Jr. will soon be testifying before Congress, Jared Kushner is trying hard not to go to prison as his father did, and the New York Times and Washington Post seem to come up with new dirt every week. None of these developments can be seen as big wins for Trump. Who knew that America's enemies might not have the United States' best interests at heart? (V & Z)

Pentagon Is Not Enforcing Anti-Transgender Directive

U.S. military leadership is, by all accounts, not too happy about Donald Trump's surprise ban on transgender soldiers. They don't like the idea of losing as many as 15,000 active duty personnel. Nor that a segment of the U.S. population will be unavailable for recruitment. Not to mention that transgender status cannot be medically proven or disproven (unless the definition were based on hardware rather than software), and so a ban would give any soldier who wanted out of their commitment early an easy way to achieve their goal.

It is no surprise, then, that no steps have been taken to act on the President's instructions. There are, in fact, some serious questions that need to be answered by Trump before they can even consider doing so. To start, does he actually intend to drum thousands of soldiers—who represent hundreds of millions of dollars spent on recruitment and training—out of the military? And, if so, what will the status of their discharge be? If they are dishonorably discharged, it would be exceedingly unfair, and would deprive them access to military healthcare and other veterans' benefits. This could trigger many lawsuits. On the other hand, Trump presumably does not intend that they should be honorably discharged. And even if he does, or if he wants to issue general discharges, there needs to be a basis for the discharge. Back in the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" era, gay soldiers' discharges were on the basis of "homosexual admission" or "homosexual conduct." But those records become available to employers, which means that if the Pentagon went a similar route this time, they would be outing transgender people without their consent. More potential lawsuits.

The lesson here for the President is that the federal bureaucracy has more power than he realizes. In particular, they are masters of foot-dragging when they want to be. Given the issues that the transgender ban raises, along with the Pentagon's obvious lack of enthusiasm, and the fact that the President got most of what he wanted—attention, pleasing the base, a distraction—simply by making the announcement, it would not be a huge surprise if this whole thing quietly fades away. (Z)

Back to the main page