One minute of silence for the people who died on Sept. 11, 2001 please. Below is a photo of the WTC Memorial.
Five polls released yesterday show Obama with leads nationally. However, convention bounces rarely are permanent and are unlikely to last in the face of a massive ad blitz that will attack everything related to him, from his health-care law to the color of Michelle's shoes. Here are the polls.
Pollster | Obama | Romney | Spread |
ABC/WaPo | 49% | 48% | Obama +1% |
Gallup | 49% | 44% | Obama +5% |
Opinion Research | 52% | 46% | Obama +6% |
Rasmussen | 50% | 45% | Obama +5% |
TIPP | 46% | 44% | Obama +2% |
One item of note is that the ABC/WaPo poll shows Obama ahead by 1 point among likely voters but ahead by 6 points among registered voters. This could indicate an enthusiasm gap. Apparently there are many voters who like Obama but aren't going to go to the trouble of actually voting. Also to keep in mind: the screens used to separate likely from unlikely voters are not very exact. Furthermore, after watching the debates, some people may change their minds about voting.
Romney's pollster, Neil Newhouse, wrote a memo attacking the polls saying Obama's bounce is a "sugar high" that will soon disappear. He said people are disappointed with Obama's handling of the economy and Romney will triumph in the end. He pointed to a long list of states Romney will win and noted that Obama won't be able to compete without resources. The only things lacking from his memo were (1) polling data and (2) any mention of the fact that Obama outraised Romney in August.
Political guru Charlie Cook's take on the campaign is that if Romney wins, it will be despite his awful campaign. Cook can hardly believe that Romney waited until his convention to actually introduce himself to the voters, especially since Obama has been pounding him as an out-of-touch rich guy for months. Cook said that while debates are a good forum to demonstrate that you have the knowledge to be President, they are a much tougher venue for convincing people that you care about them and they should trust you. Cook's view is that the voters are open to firing Obama but if they don't trust the other guy, they will grudgingly give Obama more time to finish the job.
Politico has a good rundown on what is going on in the nine swing states that will decide the election. Briefly summarized, here is the situation on the ground.
Colorado. In 2008, Colorado was very close until October, when Obama began running away with it. This year he has had a small lead most of the year. Obama's formula is high turnout among Latinos and women. This is why he brought Sandra Fluke to campaign with him in August. They'll be back. Romney's formula is a big turnout in the energy-oriented Western Slope and with evangelicals around Colorado Springs.Make a note of the dog that didn't bark: neither New Mexico nor Missouri is on the list. New Mexico is probably in the bag for Obama and Missouri is almost certainly going to go for Romney. They are rapidly losing their swing.
Princeton professor Julian Zelizer has listed three factors that will determine who wins. We agree with him. They are:
However, we would add a fourth factor: the legal war. There are fights all over the country about new laws that try to make voting harder, either by reducing early voting days and hours, requiring official government-issued photo ID to vote, or other measures. These have uniformly been done by Republican-controlled legislatures, nominally to reduce in-person voter fraud (which is virtually nonexistent), while not tackling absentee-ballot fraud (which has flipped various races in the past).
Almost all these laws end up in court and so far, the Democrats are doing well. Last month, for example, seven Republican-sponsored measures have been voided by the courts, but all will be appealed. It is possible that many of them will end up in the lap of the Supreme Court, which is probably not looking forward to their arrival. Many people believe that Chief Justice John Roberts voted to uphold the Affordable Care Act not because he liked it, but because he is planning to be Chief for another 30 years and didn't want the Court dragged through the mud by voiding a major law that Congress duly passed. If that reasoning is true, the last thing he wants is to determine the outcome of another presidential election, even though he was not on the Court in 2000.
While people get a lot of information about the economy from the news media, they also experience local conditions directly. If the media are howling about how bad things are and people see "help wanted" signs all over town, they are not going to be convinced that things are so bad. Conversely, if the media talk about the 30 consecutive months of job growth and you know many people seeking work, you are not going to be impressed. As a consequence, sorry Texans and Californians, your unemployment figures don't matter so much as those in Iowa and Nevada. Here are the unemployment numbers for the swing states for July, the last month for which they are available. The national average, 8.3% in July is also listed for comparison, even though it dropped to 8.1% in August.
State | Unemployment | Electoral votes |
Iowa | 5.3% | 6 |
New Hampshire | 5.4% | 4 |
Virginia | 5.9% | 13 |
Ohio | 7.2% | 18 |
Wisconsin | 7.3% | 10 |
Pennsylvania | 7.9% | 20 |
Colorado | 8.3% | 9 |
National average | 8.3% | 538 |
Florida | 8.8% | 29 |
Michigan | 9.0% | 16 |
North Carolina | 9.6% | 15 |
Nevada | 12.0% | 6 |
So in the 11 swing states listed, the economy is better than the national average in six (with 71 EVs), worse in four (with 66 EVs), and tied in one (9 EVs). But the absolute numbers don't tell the whole story. In Michigan, for example, it was much worse and is improving rapidly. The news there is often about companies expanding and hiring, so that puts people in a more upbeat mood than in, say, Nevada, which has the worst unemployment in the country and is fairly stable.
Mitt Romney's failure to salute the 75,000 American troops still fighting in Afghanistan could prove to be a serious blunder. Modern campaigns frequently pick up a tiny mole hill and make a giant mountain range of it, witness Romney's taking Obama's "you didn't build that" remark out of context and making it a major theme. Now it appears the Democrats are going to play that game, too. Retired general Wesley Clark, a Democrat, said yesterday that Romney's slight of the troops was "unbecoming of someone who wants to become commander in chief." Expect more Democrats to pound Romney as a guy who doesn't respect our troops. It will be hard for Romney to hit Obama on national security and foreign policy as his reply will be succinct: "Osama bin Laden." Up until now, national security hasn't been much of an issue, but to the extent Obama can drive the news cycle to it for the next week, it is a week the focus is not on the economy.
The Senate race to replace the retiring Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) has taken a weird turn. The Democratic candidate, Cynthia Dill, is largely unknown in the state and has no money, in no small part because the Democratic Party has told potential donors to sit on their wallets. The Democrats expect Independent former governor Angus King to win and caucus with them. So what are the Republicans doing? Helping Dill! Their reasoning is that by pumping up Dill, they can split the Democratic vote and hope their candidate can get a narrow plurality. It seems unlikely to work, however, as King's lead looks like it is insurmountable.
The final congressional primaries are tomorrow, so the battle for control of the House will begin Wednesday, once all the candidates are known. The Democrats need 25 net pickups to recapture it. While that is a lot, in 2006 31 seats flipped, in 2008 20 seats flipped, and in 2010 63 seats flipped. Anything is possible, although most observers expect the Democrats to gain, but not 25 seats.
At the Republican convention, Ann Romney tried to humanize her husband saying they knew poverty as students when they ate tuna fish and pasta all the time. In his column Richard Cohen skewers her and says she knows nothing of real poverty. Mitt was the son of an auto company CEO and Ann attended an elite prep school. Often the children of middle- or even upper-class families don't have so much money while they are in college, but the mere fact that the are in college separates them from people who are genuinely poor, have no education, no skills, and no chances to escape from poverty. One might be tempted to talk about the "legitimate poor," except for the fact that Todd Akin has given the adjective a bad name of late.
State | Obama | Romney | Start | End | Pollster | |
Minnesota | 50% | 40% | Sep 06 | Sep 09 | SurveyUSA | |
North Carolina | 43% | 53% | Sep 04 | Sep 06 | SurveyUSA | |
Washington | 54% | 38% | Sep 07 | Sep 09 | SurveyUSA |