Potential Presidential Candidates for 2008
Campaign 2008 is already in full swing. Who are the players?
Below we look at some potential candidates, some of whom are (semi-)announced and some of whom
are playing hard to get.
When looking at 2008 presidential candidates, always keep two things in mind.
First, every morning 100 U.S. senators look in the bathroom mirror and see a future president.
Many run, but only two sitting senators have ever been elected president: Warren Harding (R-OH) in
1920 and Jack Kennedy (D-MA) in 1960.
The reason is clear: senators have to vote thousands of times
and opponents can always dredge up some vote to batter them over the head with. The problem is
exacerbated by the intricacies of Senate procedures, where the key vote may be on
the motion to table the motion to reconsider some proposal.
Note to senators: Both Harding and Kennedy died after serving for only 2 1/2 years.
Are you really sure you want the job?
Second, people who vote in Republican primaries are to the right of the Republican Party and
way right of mainstream America and people who vote in Democratic primaries are the left of the
Democratic Party and way left of mainstream America. As a consequence, candidates who might be
able to win the general election are often disliked by primary voters as too centrist. Politicans
respond by talking fairly extreme during primary season and then ignoring what they said in the
Spring during the Fall. Count on it.
Also worth noting is that two years before the election, few people are tuned in and pollsters
asking "Who would you like to win the Democratic Party nomination might as well be asking "Please
name some Democrat." Ditto for the Republicans. In 2002, everyone was expecting Gore or Lieberman
to be the Democratic nominee in 2004. Nobody saw the rise (and fall) of Howard Dean.
Worse yet, in the Spring of 1991, Bill Clinton was in 11th place in the polls. Nobody took him seriously.
As Harold Wilson
famously remarked,: "In politics, a week is a long time."
Click on a picture for the candidate's home page.
Click on a name for the candidate's entry in the Wikipedia.
Click on a party (D) or (R) for the national party
All off-site references open in a new window. Type CTRL-W in the window to close it.
Democrats
Candidate | Notes |
Hillary Clinton (D)
|
Hillary Clinton scares the daylights out of BOTH parties.
The Democrats know that half the country hates her guts.
Part of the hatred is due to her being an "uppity woman," part due to
her being a calculating politician, and part due to her role in
the health care debacle in Bill's first term. On the other hand,
the Republicans know she can raise boatloads of money ($90 million through Sept. 30), more
than they can, and they also know that her husband is without a
doubt the best campaigner alive today.
Another strike against her is that to win, the Democrats
have to do better in the South or the interior West and a senator from
the Northeast is a tough sell there. Still, with universal name recognition,
a razor-sharp mind, and more cash than Uncle Scrooge, she's the person to beat.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Barack Obama (D)
|
Barack Obama is doing well in the early states, but a young (46) black freshman
senator with no foreign policy experience is an inviting target for the
Republicans. Yes, Jack Kennedy was 43 in 1960, but he had already served in Congress for
14 years and was a highly decorated naval hero in WWII (but Lloyd Bentsen is
dead so Obama need not fear him saying: Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy). Also
instructive is what happened to Harold Ford, Jr., another charismatic young black
Democrat, in the recent Tennessee senatorial election. The Republicans ran a
now-infamous bimbo ad showing a sleazy blonde winking at Ford, and Ford suddenly tanked.
On the other hand, Obama raised a surprisingly large amount of money
($80 million throug Sept. 30). Recent polls show him ahead in Iowa and New Hampshire.
If he can win both, he won't be home free, but will be a force to contend with.
|
Candidate | Notes |
John Edwards (D)
|
John Edwards has a lot going for him. He is well known, from the South, and knows
how to run a national campaign. He is also an extraordinarily good speaker and has
a consistent message: preventing the country from dividing into the haves and the
have nots. For middle class people barely hanging on, his economic populism could have
great appeal. The death of his 16-year son in an auto accident in 1996 and how he
recovered from that trauma gives him some authenticity that other politicians lack.
Earlier this year he had a big lead in Iowa, but that has faded. Still, Iowa polling
is notoriously inaccurate and a win here might put him in contention.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Bill Richardson (D)
|
To win the presidency, the Democrats have to do better in the South, the Lower Midwest,
or the interior West. Furthermore, governors do a lot better than senators. Add to this the
fact that Hispanics are the fastest growing ethnic group in the country. Enter
Bill Richardson stage left, the Hispanic governor of New Mexico, who previously
served in Congress, was ambassador to the United Nations, and was Bill Clinton's
Secretary of Energy. Richardson's mother is Mexican and he grew up in Mexico City,
so he speaks fluent Spanish. He just won reelection with 68% of the vote, the largest
gubernatorial win in the state's history. He is well-known in
the region and a Richardson candidacy could potentially bring in New Mexico,
Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado, all of which have sizeable and growing Hispanic
populations. On the down side, he is a boring speaker in two languages and does not
seem to be going anywhere in the polls. He might make a good Veep candidate though.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Chris Dodd (D)
|
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) has announced he is running for President.
Beats me why. He doesn't have the machine Hillary does, the charisma
Obama does, the national campaign experience Edwards does, or the
appeal to Western and Latino voters Richardson does. Maybe he is
running for Veep, but what does he bring to the ticket? Connecticut?
With Dodd on the ticket, the Democrats will definitely win Connecticut.
However, without Dodd, they will also definitely win Connecticut.
I suppose it looks good on your resume: "Ran for President."
|
Candidate | Notes |
Joe Biden (D)
|
What is about the U.S. Senate that makes all its members run for
President, no matter how microscopic their chances? While Chris
Dodd has not a prayer of winning, Joe Biden has even less. He ran for
President in 1988, but was forced out of the race when it was
discovered that he had plagiarized a speech from the British politician
Neil Kinnock. Maybe this time he could try plagiarizing from a
politician who speaks, say, Uyghur, since it will be less easily detected.
To make things worse, the day he announced, Biden said Barack Obama was
"articulate," which brought the entire punditry down on his head.
Joe should forget this nonsense and just concentrate on being a good senator.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Dennis Kucinich (D)
|
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), the boy wonder who was elected mayor of Cleveland at 31, is running for President
again, as he did in 2004. He has no chance of getting the Democratic nomination, which in his case
is liberating. Unlike the other candidates, who have to be respectful to everyone and all ideas,
no matter how nutty, Kucinich just says what he thinks. He is an unabashed old-school liberal and
has a very detailed program he is running on, including immediate removal of all U.S. troops from
Iraq, a single-payer health system for all Americans, legalizing same-sex marriage, and more.
His main problem is that with a real horse race this time between Hillary, Obama, and Edwards
few Democrats are likely to make a protest vote for him when they actually have a
real choice in influencing who the nominee is. Nevertheless, his campaign will put some ideas
on the table, however unpopular they may be in some quarters now.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Mike Gravel (D)
|
Mike Gravel, the former senator from Alaska, is running for President to the left of Dennis Kucinich.
Gravel supports gay marriage, decriminalization of marijuana, federal financing of stem cell research,
and similar positions that most candidates won't touch. However, unlike Kucinich, who has a small but
loyal core of followers, Gravel is almost totally unknown outside Alaska.
|
Republicans
Candidate | Notes |
Rudy Giuliani (R)
|
Rudy Giuliani scores well in national polls, but it is hard to imagine that
he will get the Republican nomination, despite his excellent chances in the general election.
His past is his problem. He married his second cousin, then 14 years later got an anullment when
he discovered she was his cousin. While married to his next wife, he had various widely
publicized affairs. Then he announced his divorce at a press conference--before telling
his wife--and proceeded to make his girlfriend wife #3. He has long been pro-choice, pro-gay, and
pro gun control, and as mayor of New York, appointed many Democrats as municipal judges.
His longtime friend and business partner, Bernie Kerik, has been indicted, raising questions about
Giuliani's judgement.
Up until Thanksgiving, the Base didn't seem to have a candidate. Now they may have found one in
Mike Huckabee and Rudy is dropping like a stone.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Mike Huckabee (R)
|
Mike Huckabee, born in Hope, Arkansas, just finished his second
elected term as governor of his native state. He is keenly aware that another
Hope native who governed Arkansas went on to bigger and better things.
Huckabee used to be so fat that he could barely walk up the steps to his office.
His subsequent diagnosis of diabetes scared the daylights out of him and he lost over 100 pounds and
wrote a book entitled "Quit Digging Your Grave with a Knife and Fork.
As governor he has focused on health issues. As an ordained Baptist minister
from the South, he has a leg up on the competition, but as governor, he
had to be pragmatic and is not the kind of firebrand many Republicans want.
Still, given how out of sync the rest of the field is with the Base, Huckabee might just pull it off.
|
Candidate | Notes |
John McCain (R)
|
John McCain came into this race as the clear front runner, but in a few short months all that has changed.
All his strengths (decorated Vietnam war hero, long record of achievement in Congress, maverick streak)
and all his weaknesses (his age, divorce, three bouts of malignant melanoma, refusal to kowtow to Jerry Falwell
then suddenly kowtowing to Jerry Falwell) hardly mattered any more.
Like no other candidate, he is Mr. Iraq. He has firmly attached himself to the war and the "surge."
Furthermore, the Base hates him for his principled stands on tax cuts, campaign finance, and immigration.
Nevertheless, don't count McCain out. As Charlie Cook put it, Rudy Giuliani has more baggage than a Samsonite
warehouse, Mitt Romney has yet to hit 10% in the polls, Huckabee doesn't seem to be doing that
well in New Hampshire, and Fred Thompson is a big disappointment.
McCain might win under the slogan "None of the above."
|
Candidate | Notes |
Mitt Romney (R)
|
Mitt Romney is the son of former Michigan governor and failed presidential
candidate George Romney. Romney is pro business and moderately conservative.
However, he has three major problems. First, he was a 1-term governor of
Massachusetts, a state not known for launching the careers of conservative
Republicans.
Second, he is a Mormon, and
unfortunately many evangelicals don't like Mormons on theological grounds.
Third, when running for governor of Massachusetts, he took many liberal positions that are slowly leaking out.
He has raised a lot of money, but his support seems to be moving to Huckabee in Iowa and possibly elsewhere.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Fred Thompson (R)
|
Fred Thompson announced very late, but quickly jumped to second place in the polls then fell back.
He has a certain amount of baggage (getting his girlfriend pregnant in high school, working as
a lobbyist for cigarette companies and foreign governments, etc.) but that all seems insignificant
to his lackluster style of campaigning. He doesn't seem to really want the job and that shows.
People expect a presidential candidate to be ambitious and Thompson is not.
On the positive side, if he gets wiped off the map quickly, he probably won't care.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Ron Paul (R)
|
Ron Paul is a Texas congressman who is running for President as a Republican although he ran for
President on the Libertarian ticket in 1988 and came in third with over 400,000 votes.
He still has very libertarian views and routinely votes against almost all bills that raise
taxes or increase government spending. His libertarian views often irk his Republican colleagues.
For example, he is pro life, and is thus against capital punishment as well as abortion, the latter
not entirely surprising since Paul is a gynecolegist who has delivered 4000 babies.
He is also against a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage saying it is none of the
federal government's business who you marry. As a doctor, he supports the medical use of
marijuana, again saying the federal government should not be telling doctors which drugs to prescribe.
He has raised a huge amount of money from grass roots libertarian activists. He is a real phenomenon,
but is the longest of longshots to win the nomination.
|
Candidate | Notes |
Duncan Hunter (R)
|
To say that Duncan Hunter, the congressman from CA-52 just north of San Diego, is a long shot has
to be the understatement of the year. For him to be nominated, would require half a dozen
much more serious candidates to collapse. It ain't gonna happen.
|
Back to the main page.
|