What a strange system the U.S. has. The budget for FY 2023-24 isn't complete, to the point that the government may soon shut down. And yet, entirely on the customary schedule, Joe Biden unveiled his proposed budget for FY 2024-25 yesterday.
In case you missed his State of the Union, or you heard it but didn't believe Biden was really going to unleash his inner populist, well, it's a budget that would make fellow Democrat William Jennings Bryan proud. Here are the key elements:
[T]here is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting and in terms of also the theft and the bad management of entitlements, tremendous bad management of entitlements. There's tremendous amounts of things, numbers of things you can do.Obviously, if Trump becomes president again, the U.S. will have the best entitlements ever, entitlements so great you'll get tired of how great the entitlements are. Big, beautiful entitlements is what we are saying here.
If Biden's budget was adopted lock, stock and barrel, and if the projections are on target, then it would mean a $1.6 trillion outlay in discretionary spending in 2024-25, a total in line with the agreement Biden struck with former speaker Kevin McCarthy, but a total that is also way higher than the House Republican Conference wants. The Biden budget would also cut the deficit by $3 trillion over the next 10 years, which is something that Republicans claim they want, although they obviously don't want to do it by redistributing money from corporations and wealthy people to not-wealthy people.
There is almost no chance that Biden's budget proposal is acted upon prior to November. Again, Congress hasn't even figured out this year's budget, much less next year's, and they pretty much never get the budget done on time. So, the Biden proposal is just a campaign document; a platform to run on. And as far as platforms go, it may be a pretty good one, vote-getting-wise.
The Republicans in the House also have a budget proposal, one that would slash an impressive $14 trillion from the deficit over the next decade. However, there are a few problems. First, it involves deep cuts to the things Democrats (and some Republicans) care about like, say, Medicare. Second, it is extremely fuzzy on critical details in some places. Third, it relies on wildly optimistic economic projections. We're talking "Let's assume that every year in the next 10 is better than any year in the 1920s or 1990s." We note this because Republicans are going to run on it, of course, but also because it puts Biden's proposal in context. That is to say, if $14 trillion is on the crazy side, then $3 trillion is plausible.
Meanwhile, the Biden campaign will undoubtedly spend much time today trying to think of ways to get Trump to comment again on his willingness to cut Social Security and Medicare. Maybe they can claim that if John McCain and Hillary Clinton agreed on one thing, it was the importance of increasing Social Security and Medicare. (Z)